REFERENCES

1. Ahlawat, D.; Mishra, V.; Singh, S.; et al. A family of large language models for materials research with insights into model adaptability in continued pretraining. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2026, 8, 435-48.

2. Mandal, I.; Soni, J.; Zaki, M.; et al. Evaluating large language model agents for automation of atomic force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9104.

3. Zhu, Y.; Yuan, H.; Wang, S.; et al. Large language models for information retrieval: a survey. ACM. Trans. Inf. Syst. 2025, 44, 1-54.

4. Lv, S.; Peng, L.; Wu, W.; Yao, Y.; Jiao, S.; Hu, W. Bridging language models and computational materials science: A prompt‐driven framework for material property prediction. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2025, 3, e70013.

5. Truhn, D.; Reis-Filho, J. S.; Kather, J. N. Large language models should be used as scientific reasoning engines, not knowledge databases. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 2983-4.

6. Asai, A.; He, J.; Shao, R.; et al. Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models. Nature 2026, 650, 857-63.

7. Xiao, J.; Sun, Z.; An, H.; Zhao, H.; Qiu, M.; Li, X. Optical image processing and applications empowered by vision-language models. iOptics 2025, 1, 100003.

8. Zeng, Y.; Jin, X. AI-empowered optical metasurfaces: From unit-cell optimization to system-level integration. iOptics 2025, 1, 100004.

9. Zang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, H. Fiber neural networks for the intelligent optical fiber communication signal processing. iOptics 2025, 1, 100009.

10. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; et al. Attention is all you need. arXiv 2023, arXiv:1706.03762. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (accessed 15 October 2026).

11. DeepSeek-V3 technical report. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2412.19437. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.19437 (accessed 15 October 2026).

12. He, J.; Guan, H.; Feng, W.; et al. Controlling risks of AI in chemical science with agents. AI. Sci. 2025, 1, 015002.

13. Wei, B.; Luo, W.; Du, J.; et al. Thermal interface materials: From fundamental research to applications. SusMat 2024, 4, e239.

14. Katari, M.; Jeyaraman, J.; Mohamed, I. A.; Kumaran, T. Addressing power and thermal challenges in advanced packaging for AI CPUs/GPUs: insights into multi-die stacking technology. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2023, 5, 17017.

15. Xu, K.; Lu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, L. MatterMind: a user‐friendly material design platform assisted by large language model. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2026, 4, e70075.

16. Adachi, Y.; Chen, T. T.; Sun, F.; et al. A review on inverse analysis models in steel material design. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2024, 2, e71.

17. Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Weng, L.; et al. A roadmap review of thermally conductive polymer composites: critical factors, progress, and prospects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2301549.

18. Tolstaya, A.; Suslina, I.; Tolstaya, P. Review of information databases providing data on current scientific and technical achievements. Procedia. Comput. Sci. 2016, 88, 385-90.

19. Austin, T. Towards a digital infrastructure for engineering materials data. Mater. Discov. 2016, 3, 1-12.

20. Zhang, L.; Deng, H. NJmat 2.0: user instructions of data-driven machine learning interface for materials science. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2025, 83, 1-11.

21. Zhang, L.; He, M.; Shao, S. Machine learning for halide perovskite materials. Nano. Energy. 2020, 78, 105380.

22. Agrawal, A.; Choudhary, A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL. Mater. 2016, 4, 053208.

23. Cole, J. M. A design-to-device pipeline for data-driven materials discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 599-610.

24. Li, S.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; et al. Agile conceptual design and validation based on multi-source product data and large language models: a review, framework, and outlook. J. Eng. Des. 2025, 36, 473-503.

25. Lin, Z.; Yang, C. Artificial intelligence design of sustainable aluminum alloys: a review. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2026, 86, 1-33.

26. Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C. AI-guided design of optoelectronic molecularly modified CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin films with improved aqueous stability. AI. Sci. 2026, 2, 025006.

27. Zhang, Q.; Zhuang, X.; Zhou, C.; et al. Beyond accuracy: comprehensive alignment for AI-driven molecular design. AI. Sci. 2026, 2, 023001.

28. Yao, T.; Xu, A.; Ou, P.; Yang, W. Let materials science data learn to reason. AI. for. Mater. 2025, 1, 4.

29. Cao, B.; Yang, S.; Sun, A.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, T. Y. Domain knowledge-guided interpretive machine learning: formula discovery for the oxidation behavior of ferritic-martensitic steels in supercritical water. J. Mater. Inf. 2022, 2, 4.

30. Lu, T.; Li, M.; Lu, W.; Zhang, T. Y. Recent progress in the data-driven discovery of novel photovoltaic materials. J. Mater. Inf. 2022, 2, 7.

31. Li, L.; Xu, K.; Su, R.; Gu, H.; Ma, P. Data speaks: LLM-enabled evidence auditing resets the “migration barrier” playbook for solid-state electrolytes. AI. for. Mater. 2025, 1, 2.

32. Tshitoyan, V.; Dagdelen, J.; Weston, L.; et al. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature 2019, 571, 95-8.

33. Lee, J.; Jung, W.; Baek, S. In-house knowledge management using a large language model: focusing on technical specification documents review. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2096.

34. Ralph, J.; Martynov, P.; Ma, X.; et al. Identifier service in the Mindat database: persistent and structured access to massive records of minerals and other natural materials. Data. Intell. 2025, 7, 692-711.

35. Luo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Gao, F.; Gu, J. A survey on quality evaluation of instruction fine-tuning datasets for large language models. Data. Intell. 2025, 7, 527-66.

36. He, F.; Lai, H.; Liu, J.; et al. Solving mathematical problems using large language models: a survey. Data. Intell. 2025, 7, 907-46.

37. Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Chen, X. Data-driven exploration and first-principles analysis of perovskite material. J. Mater. Inf. 2024, 4, 13.

38. Dagdelen, J.; Dunn, A.; Lee, S.; et al. Structured information extraction from scientific text with large language models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1418.

39. Miret, S.; Krishnan, N. M. A. Enabling large language models for real-world materials discovery. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2025, 7, 991-8.

40. Zhang, S.; Wang, W. Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Large language models enabled intelligent microstructure optimization and defects classification of welded titanium alloys. J. Mater. Inf. 2024, 4, 34.

41. Umer, M. S.; Nabeel, M.; Athar, U.; et al. Large language models meet molecules: a systematic review of advances and challenges in AI-driven cheminformatics. Arch. Computat. Methods. Eng. 2026, 33, 4867-908.

42. Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Ni, B.; Wang, Q. Large language models (LLMs) for materials design. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 36, e25897.

43. Zhang, D.; Jia, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Digital materials ecosystem: from databases to AI agents for autonomous discovery. Chem. Sci. 2026, 17, 5782-804.

44. Yan, Z.; Liang, H.; Wang, J.; et al. PDGPT: a large language model for acquiring phase diagram information in magnesium alloys. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2024, 2, e77.

45. Hu, Z.; You, J.; Huang, X.; Huang, H.; Tao, J.; Yi, J. Automatic construction of knowledge graphs from scientific literature for copper-based composites. Data. Intell. 2024, 6, 1168-89.

46. Velivela, P. T.; Zhao, Y. F. BIKAS: bio-inspired knowledge acquisition and simulacrum - a knowledge database to support multifunctional design concept generation. Data. Intell. 2024, 6, 531-58.

47. Jiang, X.; Wang, W.; Tian, S.; Wang, H.; Lookman, T.; Su, Y. Applications of natural language processing and large language models in materials discovery. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 79.

48. Hu, H.; Stirrat, H. J.; Alayli, A.; Saeki, A.; Huang, Y. AI-powered workflow for constructing organic materials databases from the literature: integrating large language models. ACS. Omega. 2025, 10, 49545-56.

49. Liu, C.; Kang, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. More than catastrophic forgetting: integrating general capabilities for domain-specific LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Miami, Florida, USA, November, 2024; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2024, pp 7531-48.

50. Li, X.; Ren, W.; Qin, W.; Wang, L.; Zhao, T.; Hong, R. Analyzing and reducing catastrophic forgetting in parameter efficient tuning. In ICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hyderabad, India, April 6-11, 2025; IEEE, 2025, pp 1-5.

51. Szabó, B. N.; Gyöngyössy, N. M.; Dalos, A. Applied domain adaptation of LLM-based document embeddings for engineering knowledge retrieval. In IntRob '25: Proceedings of the Intelligent Robotics FAIR 2025; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2025, pp 29-37.

52. Guo, T.; Guo, K.; Nan, B.; et al. What can large language models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, December 10-16, 2023; Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS): San Diego, California, USA, 2023, pp 59662-88.

53. Liang, P.; Bommasani, R.; Lee, T.; et al. Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2211.09110. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.09110 (accessed 15 October 2026).

54. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Benchmarking and fine-tuning large language models for GPU materials science. ChemRxiv. 2026.

55. Tong, X. C. Advanced Materials for Thermal Management of Electronic Packaging. Springer Series in Advanced Microelectronics, Vol. 30; Springer New York, 2011.

56. Thermal Management of Electronic Systems II: Proceedings of EUROTHERM Seminar 45, 20-22 September 1995, Leuven, Belgium; Beyne, E., Lasance, C. J. M., Berghmans, J., Eds.; Springer Netherlands, 1997.

57. Xu, Z.; Jiang, F.; Niu, L.; et al. Magpie: alignment data synthesis from scratch by prompting aligned LLMs with nothing. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.08464. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.08464 (accessed 15 October 2026).

58. Li, G.; Hammoud, H.; Itani, H.; Khizbullin, D.; Ghanem, B. CAMEL: communicative agents for “Mind” exploration of large language model society. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, December 10-16, 2023; Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS): San Diego, California, USA, 2023, pp 51991-2008.

59. Mitra, A.; Khanpour, H.; Rosset, C.; Awadallah, A. Orca-Math: unlocking the potential of SLMs in grade school math. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.14830. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.14830 (accessed 15 October 2026).

60. Augenstein, I.; Baldwin, T.; Cha, M.; et al. Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 852-63.

61. Miao, Z.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.; et al. Easy dataset: a unified and extensible framework for synthesizing LLM fine-tuning data from unstructured documents. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, Suzhou, China, November, 2025; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2025, pp 960-8.

62. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, J.; Yeyanhan, Y.; Luo, Z. LlamaFactory: unified efficient fine-tuning of 100+ language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations), Bangkok, Thailand, August, 2024; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2024, pp 400-10.

63. Hu, E. J.; Shen, Y.; Wallis, P.; et al. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of large language models. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2106.09685. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685 (accessed 15 October 2026).

64. Qwen; Yang, A.; Yang, B.; et al. Qwen2.5 technical report. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2412.15115. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.15115 (accessed 15 October 2026).

65. Grattafiori, A.; Dubey, A.; Jauhri, A.; et al. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.21783. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.21783 (accessed 15 October 2026).

66. Zhao, Z.; Ma, D.; Chen, L.; et al. Developing ChemDFM as a large language foundation model for chemistry. Cell. Rep. Phys. Sci. 2025, 6, 102523.

67. Zhang, D.; Liu, W.; Tan, Q.; et al. ChemLLM: a chemical large language model. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.06852. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.06852 (accessed 15 October 2026).

68. Yang, A.; Li, A.; Yang, B.; et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.09388. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.09388 (accessed 15 October 2026).

69. DeepSeek-AI; Liu, A.; Mei, A.; et al. DeepSeek-V3.2: pushing the frontier of open large language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.02556. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.02556 (accessed 15 October 2026).

70. Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Zong, Y.; et al. Evaluating the performance of large language models on GAOKAO benchmark. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.12474. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.12474 (accessed 15 October 2026).

71. Rein, D.; Hou, B. L.; Stickland, A. C.; et al. GPQA: a graduate-level google-proof Q&A benchmark. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.12022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.12022 (accessed 15 October 2026).