REFERENCES

1. Lejaeghere, K.; Bihlmayer, G.; Björkman, T.; et al. Reproducibility in density functional theory calculations of solids. Science 2016, 351, aad3000.

2. Bosoni, E.; Beal, L.; Bercx, M.; et al. How to verify the precision of density-functional-theory implementations via reproducible and universal workflows. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2023, 6, 45-58.

3. Wilkinson, M. D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I. J.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data. 2016, 3, 160018.

4. Boyd, P. G.; Chidambaram, A.; García-Díez, E.; et al. Data-driven design of metal-organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO₂ capture. Nature 2019, 576, 253-6.

5. Wang, M.; Jiang, J. Accelerating discovery of polyimides with intrinsic microporosity for membrane‐based gas separation: synergizing physics‐informed performance metrics and active learning. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2314683.

6. Tang, H.; Jiang, J. In silico screening and design strategies of ethane-selective metal-organic frameworks for ethane/ethylene separation. AIChE. J. 2020, 67, e17025.

7. Wang, T.; He, X.; Li, M.; et al. Ab initio characterization of protein molecular dynamics with AI²BMD. Nature 2024, 635, 1019-27.

8. Unke, O. T.; Chmiela, S.; Sauceda, H. E.; et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10142-86.

9. Chung, Y. G.; Gómez-Gualdrón, D. A.; Li, P.; et al. In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO₂ capture using a genetic algorithm. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600909.

10. Nandy, A.; Yue, S.; Oh, C.; et al. A database of ultrastable MOFs reassembled from stable fragments with machine learning models. Matter 2023, 6, 1585-603.

11. Terrones, G. G.; Huang, S. P.; Rivera, M. P.; Yue, S.; Hernandez, A.; Kulik, H. J. Metal-organic framework stability in water and harsh environments from data-driven models trained on the diverse WS24 data set. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 20333-48.

12. Stach, E.; Decost, B.; Kusne, A. G.; et al. Autonomous experimentation systems for materials development: a community perspective. Matter 2021, 4, 2702-26.

13. Dai, T.; Vijayakrishnan, S.; Szczypiński, F. T.; et al. Autonomous mobile robots for exploratory synthetic chemistry. Nature 2024, 635, 890-7.

14. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G. E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM. 2017, 60, 84-90.

15. Wang, A.; Singh, A.; Michael, J.; Hill, F.; Levy, O.; Bowman, S. R. GLUE: a multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP; Linzen, T.; Chrupała, G.; Alishahi, A., Eds.; Association for Computational Linguistics: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; pp 353-5.

16. Reddi, V. J.; Cheng, C. Kanter, D., et al. MLPerf inference benchmark. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 47th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA); 2020; pp 446-59.

17. Dunn, A.; Wang, Q.; Ganose, A.; Dopp, D.; Jain, A. Benchmarking materials property prediction methods: the Matbench test set and Automatminer reference algorithm. npj Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 138.

18. Riebesell, J.; Goodall, R. E. A.; Benner, P.; et al. A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2025, 7, 836-47.

19. Choudhary, K.; Wines, D.; Li, K.; et al. JARVIS-Leaderboard: a large scale benchmark of materials design methods. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 93.

20. NixOS. Declarative builds and deployments. https://nixos.org/. (accessed 2026-09-11).

21. Dolstra, E. The purely functional software deployment model. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University, 2006. https://edolstra.github.io/pubs/phd-thesis.pdf. (accessed 2026-09-11).

22. Kowalewski, M.; Seeber, P. Sustainable packaging of quantum chemistry software with the Nix package manager. Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 2022, 122, e26872.

23. Hausch, M.; Hauser, S.; Uekermann, B. Improving reproducibility of scientific software using Nix/NixOS: a case study on the preCICE ecosystem. Electron. Commun. EASST. 2025, 83.

24. Bandt, C. Assessment of reproducibility in Nix. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17372811. (accessed 2026-09-11).

25. Nixpkgs. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs. (accessed 2026-09-11).

26. Cannon, B.; Ingram, D. Ganssle, P., et al. PEP 621 - Storing project metadata in pyproject.toml. https://peps.python.org/pep-0621/. (accessed 2026-09-11).

27. PDM - A Modern Python Package and Dependency Manager. https://pdm-project.org/. (accessed 2026-09-11).

28. DREAM2NIX - Automate Reproducible Packaging for Various Language Ecosystems. https://github.com/nix-community/dream2nix. (accessed 2026-09-11).

29. NixGL - A Wrapper Tool for Nix OpenGL Application. https://github.com/nix-community/nixGL. (accessed 2026-09-11).

30. Nix System Graphics - Run Graphics Accelerated Nix Applications on Any Linux Distribution. https://github.com/soupglasses/nix-system-graphics. (accessed 2026-09-11).