REFERENCES

1. Zhou, P.; Zhou, Q.; Xiao, X.; et al. Machine learning in solid-state hydrogen storage materials: challenges and perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2413430.

2. Jia, X.; Wang, T.; Zhang, D.; et al. Advancing electrocatalyst discovery through the lens of data science: state of the art and perspectives. J. Catal. 2025, 447, 116162.

3. Li, C.; Yang, W.; Liu, H.; et al. Picturing the gap between the performance and US-DOE’s hydrogen storage target: a data-driven model for MgH₂ dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2024, 63, e202320151.

4. Li, F.; Liu, D.; Sun, K.; et al. Towards a future hydrogen supply chain: a review of technologies and challenges. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1890.

5. Chen, K.; Lau, M. Y.; Luo, X.; Huang, J.; Ouyang, L.; Yang, X. Research progress in solid-state hydrogen storage alloys: a review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2026, 246, 256-89.

6. Cai, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yao, T.; et al. A demand-driven dynamic heating strategy for ultrafast and energy-efficient MgH₂ dehydrogenation utilizing the “burst effect”. J. Energy. Storage. 2025, 130, 117495.

7. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. SciAgents: automating scientific discovery through bioinspired multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2413523.

8. Chen, X.; Yi, H.; You, M.; et al. Enhancing diagnostic capability with multi-agents conversational large language models. NPJ. Digit. Med. 2025, 8, 159.

9. Zhang, D.; Jia, X.; Hung, T. B.; et al. “DIVE” into hydrogen storage materials discovery with AI agents. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.13251. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.13251 (accessed 9 December 2025).

10. Chen, Q.; Yang, M.; Qin, L.; et al. AI4Research: a survey of artificial intelligence for scientific research. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2507.01903. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.01903 (accessed 9 December 2025).

11. Jia, S.; Zhang, C.; Fung, V. LLMatDesign: autonomous materials discovery with large language models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.13163. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.13163 (accessed 9 December 2025).

12. Kang, Y.; Kim, J. ChatMOF: an artificial intelligence system for predicting and generating metal-organic frameworks using large language models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4705.

13. Niyongabo Rubungo, A.; Arnold, C.; Rand, B. P.; Dieng, A. B. LLM-Prop: predicting the properties of crystalline materials using large language models. NPJ. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 186.

14. Lohana Tharwani, K .K.; Tharwani, L.; Kumar, R.; Sumita, Ahmed, N.; Tang, T. Large language models transform organic synthesis from reaction prediction to automation. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.05427. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.05427 (accessed 9 December 2025).

15. Yao, T.; Yang, Y.; Cai, J.; et al. From LLM to agent: a large-language-model-driven machine learning framework for catalyst design of MgH₂ dehydrogenation. J. Magnes. Alloys. 2025, S2213956725002853.

16. Wei, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. From AI for science to agentic science: a survey on autonomous scientific discovery. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.14111. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14111 (accessed 9 December 2025).

17. Zhang, Y.; Khan, S. A.; Mahmud, A.; et al. Exploring the role of large language models in the scientific method: from hypothesis to discovery. NPJ. Artif. Intell. 2025, 1, 14.

18. Xu, W.; Liang, Z.; Mei, K.; Gao, H.; Tan, J.; Zhang, Y. A-MEM: agentic memory for LLM agents. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.12110. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.12110 (accessed 9 December 2025).

19. M Bran, A.; Cox, S.; Schilter, O.; Baldassari, C.; White, A. D.; Schwaller, P. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 525-35.

20. Gridach, M.; Nanavati, J.; Zine El Abidine, K.; Mendes, L.; Mack, C. Agentic AI for scientific discovery: a survey of progress, challenges, and future directions. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.12110. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08979 (accessed 9 December 2025).

21. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. ProtAgents: protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learning. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.04268. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.04268 (accessed 9 December 2025).

22. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. AtomAgents: alloy design and discovery through physics-aware multi-modal multi-agent artificial intelligence. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.10022. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.10022 (accessed 9 December 2025).

23. Ni, B.; Buehler, M. J. MechAgents: large language model multi-agent collaborations can solve mechanics problems, generate new data, and integrate knowledge. Extreme. Mech. Lett. 2024, 67, 102131.

24. Lu, C.; Lu, C.; Lange, R. T.; Foerster, J.; Clune, J.; Ha, D. The AI scientist: towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.06292. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06292 (accessed 9 December 2025).

25. Robson, M. J.; Xu, S.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Ciucci, F. Multi-agent-network-based idea generator for zinc-ion battery electrolyte discovery: a case study on zinc tetrafluoroborate hydrate-based deep eutectic electrolytes. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2502649.

26. Liang, L.; Sun, M.; Gui, Z.; et al. KAG: boosting LLMs in professional domains via knowledge augmented generation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.13731. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.13731 (accessed 9 December 2025).

27. Guo, Z., Xia, L.; Yu, Y.; Ao, T.; Huang C.; et al. LightRAG: simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2410.05779. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.05779 (accessed 9 December 2025).

28. Han, Z.; Yang, Z.; Huang, Y.; et al. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: a comprehensive survey. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.14608. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.14608 (accessed 9 December 2025).

29. Yang, A.; Li, A.; Yang, B.; et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.09388. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.09388 (accessed 9 December 2025).

30. Mao, Y.; Yuhang Ge, Y.; Fan, Y.; et al. A survey on LoRA of large language models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.11046. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.11046 (accessed 9 December 2025).

31. Lin, C. -Y. ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In ACL-04 Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out, Text Summarization Branches Out, Barcelona, Spain, July 25-26, 2004; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, USA, 2004; pp 74-81. https://aclanthology.org/W04-1013/ (accessed 2025-12-15).

32. Papineni, K.; Roukos, S.; Ward, T.; Zhu, W. -J. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, July 6-12 2002; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, USA; 2002. pp 311-8.