REFERENCES
1. Nzeako TR, Elendu C, Echefu G, Olanisa O, Kiladejo A, Bob-Manuel ED. Artificial intelligence in interventional cardiology: a review of its role in diagnosis, decision-making, and procedural precision. Ann Med Surg. 2025;87:5720-34.
2. Sardar P, Abbott JD, Kundu A, Aronow HD, Granada JF, Giri J. Impact of artificial intelligence on interventional cardiology: from decision-making aid to advanced interventional procedure assistance. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1293-303.
3. Rempakos A, Alexandrou M, Mutlu D, et al. Predicting successful chronic total occlusion crossing with primary antegrade wiring using machine learning. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17:1707-16.
4. Samant S, Bakhos JJ, Wu W, et al. Artificial intelligence, computational simulations, and extended reality in cardiovascular interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:2479-97.
5. Ryu H, Lee M, Kim S, Kim JH, Yang H. Federated learning for cardiovascular disease prediction: a comparative review of biosignal- and EHR-based approaches. Healthcare. 2025;13:2811.
6. Skalidis I, Stalikas N, Collet C, et al. Digital twins and simulations in transcatheter coronary and structural heart interventions. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2026;7:ztaf129.
7. de Jaegere P, Roccatello G, Prendergast BD, de Backer O, Van Mieghem NM, Rajani R. Patient-specific computer simulation for transcatheter cardiac interventions: what a clinician needs to know. Heart. 2019;105:s21-7.
8. Pinna A, Boi A, Mannelli L, et al. Machine learning for coronary plaque characterization: a multimodal review of OCT, IVUS, and CCTA. Diagnostics. 2025;15:1822.
9. Mastrodicasa D, Van Assen M, Huisman M, et al. Use of AI in cardiac CT and MRI: a scientific statement from the ESCR, EuSoMII, NASCI, SCCT, SCMR, SIIM, and RSNA. Radiology. 2025;314:e240516.
10. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:435-45.
11. Xu B, Tu S, Song L, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398:2149-59.
12. Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann F, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1234-44.
13. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1395-407.
14. Agarwal A, Ranard L, Vahl T, Khalique O. Advanced computer simulation based on cardiac imaging in planning of structural heart disease interventions. J Clin Med. 2025;14:6885.
15. Hokken TW, Wienemann H, Dargan J, et al. Clinical value of CT‐derived simulations of transcatheter‐aortic‐valve‐implantation in challenging anatomies the PRECISE‐TAVI trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;102:1140-8.
16. Wang DD, Eng MH, Greenbaum AB, et al. Validating a prediction modeling tool for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;92:379-87.
17. Tang S, Razeghi O, Kapoor R, et al. Machine learning-enabled multimodal fusion of intra-atrial and body surface signals in prediction of atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2022;15:e010850.
18. Goto S, Solanki D, John JE, et al. Multinational federated learning approach to train ECG and echocardiogram models for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy detection. Circulation. 2022;146:755-69.
19. Chu M, Jia H, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, et al. Artificial intelligence and optical coherence tomography for the automatic characterisation of human atherosclerotic plaques. EuroIntervention. 2021;17:41-50.
20. Sheth TN, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Mehta SR, Courtney BK. First-in-human images of coronary atherosclerosis and coronary stents using a novel hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomographic catheter. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2427-30.
21. Bajaj R, Huang X, Alves-Kotzev N, et al. Deep learning-based plaque characterization in hybrid IVUS-OCT images is superior to single-modality deep learning analysis and human experts: head-to-head comparison against histology. Cardiovasc Res. 2026;122:245-57.
22. Zhou J, Zhang Q, Lu H, et al. Ultra-low-dose noise-free technology to reduce radiation exposure during coronary angiography. Circ: Cardiovasc Interv. 2026;19:e016542.
23. Mahmud E, Madder RD, Wohns DH, et al. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: final results of the PRECISION and PRECISION GRX studies. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025;4:100456.
24. Patel TM, Shah SC, Soni YY, et al. Comparison of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention with traditional percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis of a large cohort. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e008888.
25. Mccarthy KJ, Larnard EA, Anderson CK, et al. Automated artificial intelligence mapping of coronary plaque calcification: a comparison with manual intravascular image analysis. J Clin Med. 2025;14:8166.
26. Gaoudam N, Sakhamudi SK, Kamal B, et al. Wearable devices and AI-driven remote monitoring in cardiovascular medicine: a narrative review. Cureus. 2025;17:e90208.
27. Liang Y, Sau A, Zeidaabadi B, et al. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography to predict regurgitant valvular heart diseases: an international study. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4823-37.
28. Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet. 2019;394:861-7.
29. Kaur D, Hughes JW, Rogers AJ, et al. Race, sex, and age disparities in the performance of ECG deep learning models predicting heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2024;17:e010879.
30. Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, et al. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183:589.
31. Thirunavukarasu AJ, Ting DSJ, Elangovan K, Gutierrez L, Tan TF, Ting DSW. Large language models in medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29:1930-40.
32. Linardos A, Kushibar K, Walsh S, Gkontra P, Lekadir K. Federated learning for multi-center imaging diagnostics: a simulation study in cardiovascular disease. Sci Rep. 2022;12:3551.
33. Williams MC, Macarthur JAL, Forsyth R, Petersen SE. New ways to use imaging data in cardiovascular research: survey of opinions on federated learning and synthetic data. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025;3:qyaf012.
34. Abbas Q, Jeong W, Lee SW. Explainable AI in clinical decision support systems: a meta-analysis of methods, applications, and usability challenges. Healthcare. 2025;13:2154.
35. Haupt M, Maurer MH, Thomas RP. Explainable artificial intelligence in radiological cardiovascular imaging—a systematic review. Diagnostics. 2025;15:1399.
36. Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai VI. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20:310.
37. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366:447-53.
38. Armoundas AA, Singh JP. Total product lifecycle regulatory considerations and recommendations for generative AI-enabled medical devices. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2026;7:ztag019.
39. El Arab RA, Al Moosa OA. Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:548.
40. Tsiachristas A, Chan K, Wahome E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025;11:434-44.
41. Pletcher MJ, Pignone M, Earnshaw S, et al. Using the coronary artery calcium score to guide statin therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:276-84.
42. Chan K, Wahome E, Tsiachristas A, et al. Inflammatory risk and cardiovascular events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: the ORFAN multicentre, longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2024;403:2606-18.
43. Armoundas AA. The electrocardiogram reimagined: AI-ECG as a prognostic beacon for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4838-41.
44. Liu X, Li S, Zhu Q, Xu S, Jin Q. Interpretable semi-federated learning for multimodal cardiac imaging and risk stratification: a privacy-preserving framework. J Imaging Inform Med. 2025;38:2105-25.
45. Sengupta A, Alexis SL, Kovacic JC, Tang GHL. Current challenges in TAVI: neo-commissural alignment to mimic more physiologic valve implantation. Vessel Plus. 2020;4:40.
