REFERENCES
1. McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, Pothula VR, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2009;120:S78-84.
2. Guo MH, Wells GA, Glineur D, et al. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: the MIST trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019;78:140-5.
3. Snegirev MA, Paivin AA, Denisyuk DO, et al. Minimally invasive multivessel coronary bypass surgery: angiographic patency data. J Card Surg. 2020;35:620-5.
4. Nambala S, Mishra YK, Ruel M. Less invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: now is the time. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2021;36:735-9.
5. Ruel M, Halkos ME. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is the future: pro. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;37:34-42.
6. Sef D, Thet MS, Hashim SA, Kikuchi K. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Innovations. 2024;19:351-9.
7. Une D, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Rai V, Ruel M. Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced safely?: a learning curve analysis. Innovations. 2013;8:403-9.
8. Rodriguez ML, Lapierre HR, Sohmer B, Ruel JP, Ruel MA. Predictors and outcomes of sternotomy conversion and cardiopulmonary bypass assistance in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Innovations. 2016;11:315-20.
9. Rodriguez ML, Lapierre HR, Sohmer B, Glineur D, Ruel M. Mid-term follow-up of minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: is the early learning phase detrimental? Innovations. 2017;12:116-20.
10. Kikuchi K, Endo Y. Assistive techniques for proximal anastomosis in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Innovations. 2017;12:224-6.
11. Une D, Sakaguchi T. Initiation and modification of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:349-54.
12. Qureshi SH, Ruel M. The 7 pillars of multivessel minimally invasive coronary surgery. Innovations. 2021;16:216-7.
13. Ocagli H, Cella N, Stivanello L, Degan M, Canova C. The Barthel index as an indicator of hospital outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional study with healthcare data from older people. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77:1751-61.
14. Yushkevich PA, Yang Gao, Gerig G. ITK-SNAP: an interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:3342-5.
15. Li S, Cui J, Hao A, Zhang S, Zhao Q. Design and evaluation of personalized percutaneous coronary intervention surgery simulation system. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021;27:4150-60.
16. De Boer A, Van Der Schoot A, Bijl H. Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation. Comput Struct. 2007;85:784-95.
18. Li C, Yu P, Liu T, et al. MGPBD: a multigrid accelerated global XPBD solver. In: Alford G, Zhang H, Schulz A, editors. Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers, 2025 Aug 10-14; Vancouver, Canada. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2025. pp. 1-11.
19. Sadeghi AH, Bakhuis W, Van Schaagen F, et al. Immersive 3D virtual reality imaging in planning minimally invasive and complex adult cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2020;1:62-70.
20. Liu J, Kong Q, Tang Z, et al. Analysis of the learning curve for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;28:639-44. (in Chinese). Available from: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZXYX202106006.htm [Last accessed on 16 Apr 2026].
21. Wohl H. The cusum plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:1044-5.
22. Chen R, Cui J, Li S, Hao A. A coupling physics model for real-time 4D simulation of cardiac electromechanics. Comput Aided Des. 2024;175:103747.
23. Shahrezaei A, Sohani M, Taherkhani S, Zarghami SY. The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:1297.
24. Nia P, Daemen JHT, Maessen JG. Development of a high-fidelity minimally invasive mitral valve surgery simulator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:1567-74.
25. Pan J, Zhang L, Yu P, et al. Real-time VR simulation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on parallel position-based dynamics in GPU. In: Argelaguet F, Bruder G, Kopper R, et al., editors. 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2020 Mar 22-26; Atlanta, USA. New York: IEEE; 2020. pp. 548-56.
