REFERENCES

1. Surkova E, Muraru D, Aruta P, et al. Current clinical applications of three-dimensional echocardiography: when the technique makes the difference. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18:109.

2. Faletra FF, Agricola E, Flachskampf FA, et al. Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: how to use and when to use-a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;24:e119-97.

3. Hagendorff A, Evangelista A, Fehske W, et al. Improvement in the assessment of aortic valve and aortic aneurysm repair by 3-dimensional echocardiography. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:2225-44.

4. Fan Y, Chan JSK, Lee AP. Advances in procedural echocardiographic imaging in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:864341.

5. Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW, Anderson RH. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:74-81.

6. Underwood MJ, El Khoury G, Deronck D, Glineur D, Dion R. The aortic root: structure, function, and surgical reconstruction. Heart. 2000;83:376-80.

7. le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Robert A, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair: predictive value of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:931-9.

8. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:1-46.

9. Fiore G, Gaspardone C, Ingallina G, et al. Accuracy and reliability of left atrial appendage morphology assessment by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic glass rendering modality: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36:1083-91.

10. Wollborn J, Schuler A, Sheu RD, Shook DC, Nyman CB. Real-time multiplanar reconstruction imaging using 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in structural heart interventions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023;37:570-81.

11. Lemaire G, Vancraeynest D. Echocardiography of the aortic root: a practical approach for aortic valve-sparing surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;12:194-212.

12. Papadopoulos K, Ikonomidis I, Coisne A, et al. Initial experience with the 4D mini-TEE probe in the adult population. J Clin Med. 2024;13:6450.

13. Iung B, Delgado V, Rosenhek R, et al. EORP VHD II Investigators. Contemporary presentation and management of valvular heart disease: the EURObservational Research programme valvular heart disease II survey. Circulation. 2019;140:1156-69.

14. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:254-75.

15. Otto CM. Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2141-51.

16. Nishi T, Shibayama K, Tabata M, et al. Accuracy and usefulness of aortic annular measurement using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with direct surgical sizing. J Cardiol. 2018;71:230-6.

17. Dima CN, Gaspar M, Mornos C, et al. Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography as an alternative to multidetector computed tomography in aortic annular diameter measurements for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Biology. 2021;10:132.

18. Bleakley C, Eskandari M, Monaghan M. 3D transoesophageal echocardiography in the TAVI sizing arena: should we do it and how do we do it? Echo Res Pract. 2017;4:R21-32.

19. Mehrotra P, Flynn AW, Jansen K, et al. Differential left ventricular outflow tract remodeling and dynamics in aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1259-66.

20. Nanditha S, Malik V. Comparison of flow-independent parameters for grading severity of aortic stenosis using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography - a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth. 2020;23:425-8.

21. Gaspar T, Adawi S, Sachner R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:749-57.

22. Saitoh T, Shiota M, Izumo M, et al. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1626-31.

23. Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR, et al. PARTNER trial investigators. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2485-91.

24. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. PARTNER 2 Investigators. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1609-20.

25. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1949-60.

26. Forrest JK, Yakubov SJ, Deeb GM, et al. Low Risk Trial Investigators. 5-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85:1523-32.

27. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561-632.

28. Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefèvre T, et al. Impact of CT-guided valve sizing on post-procedural aortic regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:546-55.

29. Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Von Aspern K, et al. Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:693-703.

30. Rong LQ, Hameed I, Salemi A, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement sizing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e013463.

31. Smith LA, Dworakowski R, Bhan A, et al. Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography adds value to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:359-69.

32. Blanke P, Willson AB, Webb JG, et al. Oversizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a commonly used term but a poorly understood one: dependency on definition and geometrical measurements. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:67-76.

33. Akinseye OA, Jha SK, Ibebuogu UN. Clinical outcomes of coronary occlusion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19:229-36.

34. Mauri V, Frohn T, Deuschl F, et al. Impact of device landing zone calcification patterns on paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with different next-generation devices. Open Heart. 2020;7:e001164.

35. Hassan M, Abdrabou MM, Wahba WA, Samaan AA, Baghdady Y, Elamragy AA. Agreement between 4D transesophageal echocardiography and multi-detector computed tomography in measuring aortic root dimensions and coronary ostia heights. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;39:1561-9.

36. de Agustin JA, Pozo Osinalde E, Olmos C, et al. Current usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Clin Med. 2023;12:7748.

37. Shibayama K, Mihara H, Jilaihawi H, et al. 3D assessment of features associated with transvalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVR: a real-time 3D TEE study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:114-23.

38. Khalique OK, Hamid NB, White JM, et al. Impact of methodologic differences in three-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the aortic annulus compared with computed tomographic angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:414-21.

39. Kato N, Shibayama K, Noguchi M, et al. Superiority of novel automated assessment of aortic annulus by intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Comparison with conventional cross-sectional assessment. J Cardiol. 2018;72:321-7.

40. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011;13:250-7.

41. Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RLJ, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1518-29.

42. Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:589-90.

43. Zoghbi WA, Jone PN, Chamsi-Pasha MA, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of prosthetic valve function with cardiovascular imaging: a report from the American Society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024;37:2-63.

44. Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Stewart J, et al. Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort-a analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1323-34.

45. ISO. International Standard, ISO 5840:2015. Cardiovascular implants-cardiac valve prostheses. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2015. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/77033.html#lifecycle [Last accessed on 19 Aug 2025].

46. Durko AP, Head SJ, Pibarot P, et al. Characteristics of surgical prosthetic heart valves and problems around labelling: a document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)-The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) valve labelling task force. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:1025-36.

47. Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3538-700.

48. Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, et al. Endorsed by the Heart Valve Society (HVS); European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI); Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS); Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR); Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT); North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI) and the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:448-76.

49. Paulis R, Salica A. Surgical anatomy of the aortic valve and root-implications for valve repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8:313-21.

50. Malas T, Saczkowski R, Sohmer B, et al. Is aortic valve repair reproducible? Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:1497.e15-22.

51. Berrebi A, Monin JL, Lansac E. Systematic echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation-what should the surgeon know for aortic valve repair? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8:331-41.

52. Lang RM, Addetia K, Narang A, Mor-Avi V. 3-dimensional echocardiography: latest developments and future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:1854-78.

53. Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:921-64.

54. Smer A, Urja P, Anugula D, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the aortic valve and the aorta. Echocardiography. 2022;39:1011-27.

55. Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Watremez C, et al. Assessment and repair of aortic valve cusp prolapse: implications for valve-sparing procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:917-25.

56. Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the american society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303-71.

57. Ranard LS, Bonow RO, Nishimura R, et al. Heart Valve Collaboratory. Imaging methods for evaluation of chronic aortic regurgitation in adults: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82:1953-66.

58. Agricola E, Badano L, Mele D, et al. Real-time three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: technical aspects and clinical applications. Heart Int. 2010;5:e6.

59. Stoebe S, Metze M, Jurisch D, et al. Analysis of chronic aortic regurgitation by 2D and 3D echocardiography and cardiac MRI. Echo Res Pract. 2018;5:51-62.

60. Ewe SH, Delgado V, van der Geest R, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of aortic regurgitation and validation by three-dimensional three-directional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:560-6.

61. Choi J, Hong GR, Kim M, et al. Automatic quantification of aortic regurgitation using 3D full volume color doppler echocardiography: a validation study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:1379-89.

62. Shanks M, Siebelink HM, Delgado V, et al. Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: comparison between three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:694-700.

63. Shiota T. 3D echocardiography: the present and the future. J Cardiol. 2008;52:169-85.

64. Connor B, Takei M, Clark DE, Maskatia SA. Improved quantification of aortic regurgitation with direct regurgitant jet measurement by four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in complex congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27:101876.

65. Belli M, Margonato D, Prandi FR, et al. Diagnosis of atrial cardiomyopathy: from the electrocardiogram to the new opportunities with multimodality imaging. J Cardiovasc Med. 2025;26:88-101.

66. Schäfers HJ, Schmied W, Marom G, Aicher D. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:269-74.

67. Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:436-8.

68. Schäfers HJ, Aicher D, Langer F, Lausberg HF. Preservation of the bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:S740-5; discussion S785.

69. Schäfers HJ. The 10 commandments for aortic valve repair. Innovations. 2019;14:188-98.

70. De Paulis R, Chirichilli I, De Kerchove L, et al. Current status of aortic valve repair surgery. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:1394-411.

71. Ehrlich T, de Kerchove L, Vojacek J, et al. State-of-the art bicuspid aortic valve repair in 2020. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63:457-64.

72. Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Dux-Santoy L, Guala A, Galian-Gay L, Evangelista A. Mechanisms of aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82:448-64.

73. La Mura L, Lembo M, Musella F, et al. Aortic regurgitation in bicuspid aortic valve: the role of multimodality imaging. J Clin Med. 2024;13:3924.

74. Italiano G, Tamborini G, Fusini L, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of the automated software for dynamic quantification of left ventricular and atrial volumes and function in a large unselected population. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5030.

75. Marigliano AN, Ortiz JT, Casas J, Evangelista A. Aortic regurgitation: from valvular to myocardial dysfunction. J Clin Med. 2024;13:2929.

76. Tretter JT, Burbano-Vera NH, Najm HK. Multi-modality imaging evaluation and pre-surgical planning for aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aortic root aneurysm. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;12:295-317.

77. Hahn RT, Leipsic J, Douglas PS, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:25-34.

78. Komiya T, Shimamoto T, Nonaka M, Matsuo T. Is small cusp size a limitation for aortic valve repair? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:497-502.

Vessel Plus
ISSN 2574-1209 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/