REFERENCES
1. Upchurch GR Jr, Escobar GA, Azizzadeh A, et al. Society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2021;73:55S-83S.
2. Riambau V, Böckler D, Brunkwall J, et al. Editor’s choice - management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53:4-52.
3. Liisberg M, Baudier F, Akgül C, Lindholt JS. Long-term thoracic endovascular repair follow-up from 1999 to 2019: a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2022;86:399-407.
4. Geisbüsch P, Hoffmann S, Kotelis D, Able T, Hyhlik-Dürr A, Böckler D. Reinterventions during midterm follow-up after endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic disease. J Vasc Surg 2011;53:1528-33.
6. Brown JA, Arnaoutakis GJ, Szeto WY, Serna-Gallegos D, Sultan I. Endovascular repair of the aortic arch: state of the art. J Card Surg 2021;36:4292-300.
7. Altnji HE, Bou-Saïd B, Walter-Le Berre H. Morphological and stent design risk factors to prevent migration phenomena for a thoracic aneurysm: a numerical analysis. Med Eng Phys 2015;37:23-33.
8. Dieleman IM, Zuidema R, de Beaufort HW, et al. Determination of the gained proximal sealing zone length after debranching of the left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg 2023;64:134-41.
9. Kudo T, Kuratani T, Shimamura K, Sawa Y. Determining the optimal proximal landing zone for TEVAR in the aortic arch: comparing the occurrence of the bird-beak phenomenon in zone 0 vs zones 1 and 2. J Endovasc Ther 2020;27:368-76.
10. Lescan M. Apposition and accuracy of TEVAR-is proximal angulation the key? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;60:1464-5.
11. Lescan M, Czerny M, Berezowski M, et al. Morphologic performance analysis of the Relay nonbare stent graft in dissected thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg 2019;70:1390-8.
12. Antonello M, Squizzato F, Dall’Antonia A, Grego F, Piazza M. GORE TAG thoracic endograft with active control system: landing accuracy and wall apposition in an initial clinical experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:261-9.
13. Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:133-62.
14. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, de Beaufort HW, Secchi F, et al. A geometric reappraisal of proximal landing zones for thoracic endovascular aortic repair according to aortic arch types. J Vasc Surg 2017;65:1584-90.
15. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, de Beaufort HW, Piffaretti G, et al. The modified arch landing areas nomenclature predicts proximal endograft failure after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:309-18.
16. Nasr B, Savean J, Albert B, et al. Thoracic stent-graft migration: the role of the geometric modifications of the stent-graft at 3 years. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:16-23.
17. Boufi M, Guivier-Curien C, Dona B, et al. Risk factor analysis for the mal-positioning of thoracic aortic stent grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016;52:56-63.
18. Kudo T, Kuratani T, Shimamura K, et al. Type 1a endoleak following Zone 1 and Zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair: effect of bird-beak configuration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:718-24.
19. Cao L, Ge Y, He Y, et al. Association between aortic arch angulation and bird-beak configuration after thoracic aortic stent graft repair of type B aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020;31:688-96.
20. Figueroa CA, Taylor CA, Chiou AJ, Yeh V, Zarins CK. Magnitude and direction of pulsatile displacement forces acting on thoracic aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther 2009;16:350-8.
21. Domanin M, Bissacco D, Romarowsky RM, et al. Drag forces after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. general review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 2021;75:479-88.
22. Melissano G, Civilini E, Bertoglio L, et al. Results of endografting of the aortic arch in different landing zones. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:561-6.
23. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, van Bakel TM, Romarowski RM, et al. The modified arch landing areas nomenclature (MALAN) improves prediction of stent graft displacement forces: proof of concept by computational fluid dynamics modelling. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018;55:584-92.
24. Lee WA. Failure modes of thoracic endografts: prevention and management. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:792-9.
25. Antonello M, Squizzato F, Colacchio EC, Spertino A, Grego F, Piazza M. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair using the C-TAG® device with ACTIVE CONTROL system. Surg Technol Int 2022;40:sti40/1509.
26. Chen Y, Zhang S, Liu L, Lu Q, Zhang T, Jing Z. Retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e004649.
27. Riambau V, Giudice R, Trabattoni P, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the low-profile relay stent-graft in patients with thoracic aortic disease: the regeneration study. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:180-9.
28. Piazza M, Squizzato F, Milan L, Miccoli T, Grego F, Antonello M. Incidence and predictors of early neurological complications following thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair in the global registry for endovascular aortic treatment (great). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019;58:e238.
29. Boufi M, Aouini F, Guivier-Curien C, et al. Examination of factors in type I endoleak development after thoracic endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2015;61:317-23.
30. Kuo EC, Veranyan N, Johnson CE, et al. Impact of proximal seal zone length and intramural hematoma on clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 2019;69:987-95.
31. Yoon WJ, Mell MW. Outcome comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed outside versus inside proximal landing zone length recommendation. J Vasc Surg 2020;72:1883-90.
32. Lombardi JV, Famularo M, Kratzberg J, Roeder BA. Effect of proximal fixation length on complications after endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2021;73:1189-96.e3.
33. Piazza M, Squizzato F, Xodo A, et al. Determination of optimal and safest proximal sealing length during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021;62:423-30.
34. Gottardi R, Berger T, Voetsch A, et al. What is the best method to achieve safe and precise stent-graft deployment in patients undergoing TEVAR? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021;69:357-61.
35. Wang L, Zhao Y, Zhang W, et al. Retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: incidence, time trends and risk factors. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021;33:639-53.
36. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Rylski B, Schofer F, et al. Prevalence of type III arch configuration in patients with type B aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;56:1075-80.
37. Sun L, Li J, Wang L, et al. Aortic geometric alteration associated with acute type B aortic dissection: angulation, tortuosity, and arch type. Front Physiol 2021;12:708651.
38. Squizzato F, Hyun MC, Sen I, et al. Predictors of long-term aortic growth and disease progression in patients with aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer. Ann Vasc Surg 2022;81:22-35.
