Response of Wegner’s granulomatosis to Anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody therapy, 2001[16] | Case Report | To describe the successful use of rituximab to treat a patient with chronic, relapsing GPA who did not tolerate cyclophosphamide therapy and was resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil | Rituximab was able to successfully induce and maintain disease remission in a patient with chronic, relapsing GPA resistant to other immunosuppressants | The report only describes the response of one individual to rituximab which fails to generalize the results to other patients with ANCA associated vasculitis |
Nine patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis successfully treated with rituximab, 2005[17] | Case series which included with structured patient follow up | To review the outcomes of 9 patients with MPA and GPA treated with rituximab who were either resistant to or had recurrent relapses after cessation of cyclophosphamide | Rituximab was efficient and safe as an induction and maintenance therapy for patients with MPA and GPA | No control arm
Possible selection bias
Patients received additional immunosuppressive medications while they were on treatment with rituximab |
Adjunction of rituximab to steroids and immunosuppressants for refractory/relapsing Wegner’s granulomatosis: a study on 8 patients, 2007[18] | Retrospective study of 8 patients with refractory or relapsing GPA who received rituximab infusions in addition to their ongoing immunosuppressive therapy | To investigate rituximab use in conjunction with ongoing steroid and immunosuppressant therapy as a treatment for relapsing/refractory GPA and to determine the frequency of infusions, time to patient response and, effects on the various manifestations of GPA | Treatment of relapsing/refractory GPA with rituximab in conjunction with steroids/immunosuppressants resulted in good clinical outcomes
There was a dissociation in the time to response of vasculitis manifestations (improved over days to weeks) vs. granulomatous manifestations (improved over several months) to rituximab | Patients were receiving concomitant immunosuppressive therapy so it is difficult to tell if results could be attributed to rituximab alone |
A multicenter survey of Rituximab therapy for refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 2009[19] | Standardized, retrospective data collection from 65 patients at 4 centers in the UK with a history of refractory AAV who received rituximab as induction therapy (largest series reported at that time) | To determine if rituximab is a safe and effective option in treating patients with ANCA associated vasculitis | Rituximab was found to be successful as an induction therapy in patients with AAV
Additionally, patients who received preemptive retreatment in the absence of any signs of a relapse with a regimen of 1 g rituximab every 6 months had no disease relapse at eleven- month follow up, suggesting rituximab as a viable maintenance therapy | Possibility of positive outcome bias given that the study was a retrospective review |
Rituximab as maintenance therapy for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 2010[20] | Retrospective review of 39 patients with AAV who received maintenance therapy with rituximab | To determine the efficacy and safety of rituximab infusions as maintenance therapy in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis who had achieved complete or partial remission | Rituximab was safe and effective in maintaining disease remission in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis | Comparison with other studies is limited because this cohort had lower disease activity at study onset |
Rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegner’s), 2012: ten year experience at a single center[21] | Single-center historical cohort study observing all patients (53 total) with a history of chronic relapsing GPA treated with rituximab therapy from January 1, 2000 to May 31, 2010 | To determine the efficacy of rituximab as a therapy for maintenance of remission in patients with a history of chronic relapsing refractory GPA | Rituximab was effective and well tolerated as an induction and maintenance therapy in patients with a history of chronic relapsing GPA | Open-label administration of rituximab
Experience of study was only from one center with a predominantly Caucasian population of Scandinavian and Northern European background
Except for 1 patient, all patients were PR-3 ANCA positive |
Rituximab maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis, 2012[22] | Retrospective study of the outcomes and tolerance of patients with MPA and GPA treated with rituximab maintenance therapy | To investigate the efficacy of rituximab as a maintenance therapy in patients with AAV who achieved disease remission with conventional immunosuppressants or rituximab | Rituximab was well tolerated and maintained remission of patients with GPA and MPA however, it did not completely prevent relapses
**The preliminary results of this study were to be confirmed by the MAINRITSAN trial which was in progress when the results of this study were published | Half of the patients had received additional immunosuppression concomitantly with rituximab, making it difficult to discern if the low relapse rates were solely attributable to rituximab use
Preliminary study which did not allow conclusions about the exact role of rituximab in treating AAV |
MAINRITSAN trial, 2014[23] | Nonblinded, randomized controlled trial | To compare rituximab infusions to azathioprine as maintenance therapy in patients with ANCA associated vasculitis (MPA, GPA, and renal-associated ANCA vasculitis) | Rituximab infusions of 500 mg given every 6 months were superior to azathioprine as maintenance therapy in AAV, particularly in patients who are PR-3 ANCA positive | Trial was not blinded
Fewer patients with anti-MPO ANCA positive vasculitis, MPA, or renal limited disease |
MAINRITSAN2 trial, 2018[24] | Open-label, pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial | To compare rituximab infusions tailored to the appearance of ANCA autoantibodies, increasing ANCA titers and/or the presence of CD19+ B cells in the circulation measured every three months to fixed dose regimens of rituximab in patients with GPA or MPA as maintenance therapy | There was not a significant difference in the number of relapses in the tailored infusion group vs. the fixed dose regimen group; tailored infusion group received fewer infusions while still maintaining a low relapse rate | Open-labeled but all relapses were assessed by an independent Adjudication Committee who was not aware of the treatment arm or the circulating CD19+ B cell count
There were 59 centers with testing performed at each individual center (as opposed to all testing being done in the same laboratory), however, all labs for a given patient had to be drawn at the same laboratory |
RITAZAREM trial, 2019[25] | International, multi-center, open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial | To compare the efficacy of rituximab vs. oral azathioprine as a maintenance therapy in patients with a history of relapsing AAV who had received induction therapy with rituximab | Rituximab was superior to azathioprine as maintenance therapy in AAV patients with a history of prior relapses | Investigators were given the option to choose the glucocorticoid tapering regimen after induction therapy as opposed to using a blinded, randomly assigned tapering schedule |
Prolonged B cell depletion with rituximab is effective in treating refractory pulmonary granulomatous inflammation in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), 2014[26] | Retrospective case series | To investigate the efficacy of rituximab infusions in treating pulmonary granulomas in patients with GPA who were previously resistant to traditional immunosuppressive treatment | Prolonged B cell depletion following rituximab infusion was effective in reducing both the size and number of pulmonary nodules in these patients for at least 18 months after treatment | Small patient cohort (5 patients) makes results hard to generalize |
Rituximab for treatment of severe renal disease in ANCA associated vasculitis, 2016[28] | Retrospective multi-center study | To investigate the efficacy of rituximab and glucocorticoids alone vs. rituximab, glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide as a treatment for AAV patients with severe renal disease | There was no difference in outcomes between the rituximab and glucocorticoids arm vs. rituximab, glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide arm | Concomitant glucocorticoid administration with rituximab makes it difficult to discern if the results can be solely attributable to rituximab |
Rituximab in the treatment of refractory scleritis in patients with polyangiitis (Wegener’s), 2015[29] | Retrospective analysis of interventional case series | To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in patients with a history of GPA who developed scleritis that was refractory to conventional immunosuppressant therapy | Four weeks after treatment with rituximab, all patients showed improvement of refractory necrotizing anterior scleritis and no further disease progression | Small patient cohort (8 patients) makes results hard to generalize |
Rituximab therapy for refractory orbital inflammation: results of a phase 1/2, dose-ranging, randomized controlled trial, 2014[30] | Dose ranging, randomized, double masked phase 1/2 clinical trial | To determine the efficacy of rituximab in treating orbital inflammation | Rituximab was effective in treating orbital inflammation due to GPA that was refractory to previous immunosuppressive treatment | Small patient cohort (10 patients total with orbital inflammation, 2 of these patients had GPA) |
Successful treatment of hypertrophic pachymeningitis in refractory Wegener’s granulomatosis with rituximab, 2009[31] | Case Report | To describe the use of rituximab to treat a patient with GPA who developed pachymeningitis which was refractory to treatment with cyclophosphamide and pulsed dose methylprednisolone | The patient experienced complete remission after treatment with rituximab | Case report details the response of one individual patient to treatment thus these results cannot be extrapolated to other patients with this condition without further studies |
Effectiveness of Rituximab for the otolaryngologic manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s)[32] | Retrospective analysis | To determine the efficacy of rituximab in treating the ENT manifestations of GPA | Rituximab was found to be an effective treatment for ENT manifestations of GPA | Comments only on the ENT (granulomatous) manifestations of GPA, does not explore efficacy of rituximab for treatment of GPA manifestations secondary to systemic vasculitis |
Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage secondary to antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: predictors of respiratory failure and clinical outcomes, 2016[33] | Single center historical cohort study | To determine the efficacy of plasma exchange, cyclophosphamide and rituximab in treating diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in patients with AAV | Complete remission was achieved at a higher rate with rituximab than with cyclophosphamide, addition of plasma exchange did not improve outcomes | Study included predominantly patients with GPA rather than MPA |
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.