REFERENCES
1. Gill DK, Walia K, Rawat A, et al. 3D modelling and printing of craniofacial implant template. RPJ. 2019;25:397-403.
2. Tel A, Arboit L, De Martino M, Isola M, Sembronio S, Robiony M. Systematic review of the software used for virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery over the last decade. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52:775-86.
3. Hwang K, Lee DK, Lee WJ, Chung IH, Lee SI. A split ostectomy of mandibular body and angle reduction. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15:341-6.
4. Kane AA, Lo LJ, Chen YR, Hsu KH, Noordhoff MS. The course of the inferior alveolar nerve in the normal human mandibular ramus and in patients presenting for cosmetic reduction of the mandibular angles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1162-74.
5. Schicho K, Figl M, Seemann R, et al. Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgery. Med Phys. 2006;33:3408-17.
6. Andreucci CA, Fonseca EMM, Jorge RN. Biomechanics of a novel 3D mandibular osteotomy design. Designs. 2024;8:57.
7. Ganga K, Mcmullen C. State-of-the-art management for challenging complications in head and neck surgery. Plast Aesthet Res. 2023;10:69.
8. Cui J, Zhu S, Hu J, Li J, Luo E. The effect of different reduction mandibuloplasty types on lower face width and morphology. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:593-8.
9. Ye N, Long H, Zhu S, Yang Y, Lai W, Hu J. The accuracy of computer image-guided template for mandibular angle ostectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39:117-23.
10. Fu X, Qiao J, Girod S, et al. Standardized protocol for virtual surgical plan and 3-dimensional surgical template-assisted single-stage mandible contour surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;79:236-42.
11. He D, Du W, Li J, Liu L, Luo E. Clinical feasibility and efficiency of a 3-dimensional printed surgical template for mandibular angle osteotomy and mandibular angle splitting osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:594-9.
12. Zhang C, Ma MW, Xu JJ, et al. Application of the 3D digital ostectomy template (DOT) in mandibular angle ostectomy (MAO). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46:1821-7.
13. Wu G, Xie Z, Shangguan W, et al. The accuracy of a patient-specific three-dimensional digital ostectomy template for mandibular angle ostectomy. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42:447-57.
14. Jin T, Liu J, Gui L, Niu F, Yu B. Computer-assisted design of sequential surgical procedure for oblique facial clefts with mandibular outer cortex autografts. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:373-7.
15. Lin HH, Chang HW, Wang CH, Kim SG, Lo LJ. Three-dimensional computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: experience of 37 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:S118-26.
16. Ritschl LM, Mücke T, Fichter A, et al. Functional outcome of CAD/CAM-assisted versus conventional microvascular, fibular free flap reconstruction of the mandible: a retrospective study of 30 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33:281-91.
17. Melnik AK. A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:355-66.
18. Cha J, Park K, Ryu J, et al. Does mandible ramus height asymmetry affect postoperative skeletal stability in orthognathic surgery patients?. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;46:32.
19. Zhang C, Lu T, Wang L, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of hard and soft tissue changes in skeletal class II patients with high mandibular plane angle undergoing surgery. Sci Rep. 2024;14:2519.
20. Jiang N, Hsu Y, Khadka A, et al. Total or partial inferior border ostectomy for mandibular contouring: indications and outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:e277-84.
21. Mao X, Fu X, Niu F, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular angle classification and aesthetic evaluation of the lower face in Chinese female adults. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81:12-7.
22. Qiao J, Xu J, Fu X, et al. Assessment of a novel standardized training system for mandibular contour surgeries. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21:221-9.
23. Fu X, Rui L, Niu F, et al. Reduction gonioplasty: bone regeneration and soft tissue response. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:603-8.
