REFERENCES

1. Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh A, et al. Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:919-926.

2. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:15-23.

3. Masoomi H, Hanson SE, Clemens MW, Mericli AF. Autologous breast reconstruction trends in the United States: using the nationwide inpatient sample database. Ann Plast Surg 2021;87:242-247.

4. Shah JK, Amakiri UO, Cevallos P, et al. Updated trends and outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction in the United States, 2016–2019. Ann Plast Surg 2024;92:e1-e13.

5. Dempsey K, Mathieu E, Brennan M, et al. The role of breast reconstruction choice on body image patient-reported outcomes at four years post-mastectomy for breast cancer: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Psychooncology 2022;31:54-61.

6. Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;146:117-126.

7. Metcalfe KA, Semple J, Quan M, et al. Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:233-241.

8. Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2018;153:891-899.

9. Retrouvey H, Kerrebijn I, Metcalfe KA, et al. Psychosocial functioning in women with early breast cancer treated with breast surgery with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:2444-2451.

10. Dempsey K, Mathieu E, Brennan M, et al. Patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes following mastectomy for breast cancer, with immediate, delayed or no breast reconstruction: four-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study. The Breast 2023;71:122-131.

11. Nelson JA, Shamsunder MG, Myers PL, et al. Matched preliminary analysis of patient-reported outcomes following autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2022;29:5266-5275.

12. Polanco TO, Shamsunder MG, Parikh RP, et al. Quality of life in breast reconstruction patients after irradiation to tissue expander: a propensity-matched preliminary analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;152:259-269.

13. Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, et al. Women’s motives to opt for either implant or diep-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:1062-1067.

14. Nelson JA, Cordeiro PG, Polanco T, et al. Association of radiation timing with long-term satisfaction and health-related quality of life in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;150:32E-41E.

15. Qiu CS, Jordan SW, Dorfman RG, et al. Surgical duration impacts venous thromboembolism risk in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34:47-58.

16. Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B, et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2018;229:134-144.

17. Allan J, Goltsman D, Moradi P, Ascherman JA. The effect of operative time on complication profile and length of hospital stay in autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction patients: an analysis of the 2007-2012 ACS-NSQIP database. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;73:1292-1298.

18. Fogarty BJ, Khan K, Ashall G, Leonard AG. Complications of long operations: a prospective study of morbidity associated with prolonged operative time (> 6 h). Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:33-36.

19. Elliott LF, Seify H, Bergey P. The 3-hour muscle-sparing free TRAM flap: safe and effective treatment review of 111 consecutive free TRAM flaps in a private practice setting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:27-34.

20. Marsh D, Patel NG, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, Sharma H, Ramakrishnan VV. Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency. Gland Surg 2016;5:107-114.

21. Canizares O, Mayo J, Soto E, Allen RJ, Sadeghi A. Optimizing efficiency in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2015;75:186-192.

22. Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Efficient DIEP flap: bilateral breast reconstruction in less than four hours. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3801.

23. Steele TN, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Efficiency in microvascular breast reconstruction. Curr Surg Rep 2024;12:89-96.

24. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010;363:2477-2481.

25. Tsevat J, Moriates C. Value-based health care meets cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:329-332.

26. Teisberg E, Wallace S, O’Hara S. Defining and implementing value-based health care: a strategic framework. Acad Med 2020;95:682-685.

27. Jones LK, Raphaelson M, Becker A, Kaloides A, Scharf E. MACRA and the future of value-based care. Neurol Clin Pract 2016;6:459-465.

28. Squitieri L, Chung KC. Value-based payment reform and the medicare access and children’s health insurance program reauthorization act of 2015: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:205-214.

30. Easton J, Roberto A, Lax E, Reyna C, Dale E. using a business model (the 4 disciplines of execution) to improve consistency, efficiency, and length of stay in microvascular autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022;89:532-537.

31. Stein MJ, Dec W, Lerman OZ. Lean and six sigma methodology can improve efficiency in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3669.

32. Mason SE, Nicolay CR, Darzi A. The use of lean and six sigma methodologies in surgery: a systematic review. The Surgeon 2015;13:91-100.

33. Hultman CS, Kim S, Lee CN, et al. Implementation and analysis of a lean six sigma program in microsurgery to improve operative throughput in perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016;76 Suppl 4:S352-S356.

34. Najjar PA, Strickland M, Kaplan RS. Time-driven activity-based costing for surgical episodes. JAMA Surg 2017;152:96-97.

35. Mericli AF, McHugh T, Kruse B, DeSnyde SM, Rebello E, Offodile AC. Time-driven activity-based costing to model cost utility of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2020;230:784-794.e3.

36. Sharma HR, Rozen WM, Mathur B, Ramakrishnan V. 100 steps of a DIEP flap—a prospective comparative cohort series demonstrating the successful implementation of process mapping in microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2016.

37. Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Deconstructing the reconstruction: evaluation of process and efficiency in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:717e-724e.

38. Lee BT, Tobias AM, Yueh JH, et al. Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:865-873.

39. Todd AR, Genereux O, Schrag C, Hatchell A, Matthews J. Improved operative efficiency and surgical times in autologous breast reconstruction: a 15-year single-center retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023;11:e5231.

40. Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A. Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71:468-477.

41. Vasile JV, Levine JL. Magnetic resonance angiography in perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016;5:197-211.

42. Thiessen FEF, Tondu T, Cloostermans B, et al. Dynamic InfraRed thermography (DIRT) in DIEP-Flap breast reconstruction: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;242:47-55.

43. Speck NE, Dreier K, Fluetsch A, Babst D, Lardi AM, Farhadi J. Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study. Gland Surg 2022;11:1754-1763.

44. Cevik J, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. The importance of perioperative team familiarity and its contribution to surgical efficiency and outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2023;12:1-4.

45. Bauermeister AJ, Zuriarrain A, Newman M, Earle SA, Medina MA. Impact of continuous two-team approach in autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33:298-304.

46. Weichman KE, Lam G, Wilson SC, et al. The impact of two operating surgeons on microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:277-284.

47. Haddock NT, Kayfan S, Pezeshk RA, Teotia SS. Co-surgeons in breast reconstructive microsurgery: what do they bring to the table? Microsurgery 2018;38:14-20.

48. Mericli AF, Chu CK, Sisk GC, et al. Microvascular breast reconstruction in the era of value-based care: use of a cosurgeon is associated with reduced costs, improved outcomes, and added value. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:338-348.

49. Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Five steps to internal mammary vessel preparation in less than 15 minutes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:884-886.

50. Malagón-López P, Vilà J, Carrasco-López C, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for fat necrosis reduction in the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Aesthet Surg J 2019;39:NP45-NP54.

51. Malagón-López P, Carrasco-López C, García-Senosiain O, Vilà J, Del-Río M, Priego D, Julian-Ibáñez JF, Higueras-Suñe C. When to assess the DIEP flap perfusion by intraoperative indocyanine green angiography in breast reconstruction? Breast 2019;47:102-108.

52. Ludolph I, Bettray D, Beier JP, Horch RE, Arkudas A. Leaving the perfusion zones? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75:52-60.

53. Hembd AS, Yan J, Zhu H, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Intraoperative assessment of DIEP flap breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiography: reduction of fat necrosis, resection volumes, and postoperative surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146:1e-10e.

54. Martinez CA, Boutros SG. Outpatient microsurgical breast reconstruction. last Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e3109.

55. Martinez CA, Reis SM, Rednam R, Boutros SG. The outpatient diep: safety and viability following a modified recovery protocol. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1898.

56. Tapp MW, Duet ML, Steele TN, et al. Postoperative day 1 discharge in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023;11:e5064.

57. Haddock NT, Garza R, Boyle CE, Liu Y, Teotia SS. Defining enhanced recovery pathway with or without liposomal bupivacaine in diep flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:948-957.

Plastic and Aesthetic Research
ISSN 2349-6150 (Online)   2347-9264 (Print)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/