REFERENCES

1. Sgarzani R, Negosanti L, Morselli PG, Vietti Michelina V, Lapalorcia LM, Cipriani R. Patient satisfaction and quality of life in DIEAP flap versus implant breast reconstruction. Surg Res Pract 2015;2015:405163.

2. Miseré RM, van Kuijk SM, Claassens EL, Heuts EM, Piatkowski AA, van der Hulst RR. Breast-related and body-related quality of life following autologous breast reconstruction is superior to implant-based breast reconstruction - A long-term follow-up study. Breast 2021;59:176-82.

3. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1585-95.

4. Levine SM, Patel N, Disa JJ. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:380-2.

5. Matros E, Albornoz CR, Razdan SN, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:937-46.

6. Massey MF, Spiegel AJ, Levine JL, et al; Group for the Advancement of Breast Reconstruction. Perforator flaps: recent experience, current trends, and future directions based on 3974 microsurgical breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:737-51.

7. Kato H, Hasegawa M, Takada T, Torii S. The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:541-6.

8. Lui KW, Hu S, Ahmad N, Tang M. Three-dimensional angiography of the superior gluteal artery and lumbar artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:79-86.

9. Bissell MB, Greenspun DT, Levine J, et al. The lumbar artery perforator flap: 3-dimensional anatomical study and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 2016;77:469-76.

10. Roche NA, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel PN, Matton G, Monstrey SJ. The use of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:7-14.

11. de Weerd L, Weum S. The butterfly design: coverage of a large sacral defect with two pedicled lumbar artery perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg 2002;55:251-3.

12. de Weerd L, Elvenes OP, Strandenes E, Weum S. Autologous breast reconstruction with a free lumbar artery perforator flap. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:180-3.

13. Greenspun DT. Discussion: lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:715e-6e.

14. Augustin A, Pülzl P, Morandi EM, et al. Donor-site morbidity and quality of life after autologous breast reconstruction with PAP versus TMG flap. Curr Oncol 2022;29:5682-97.

15. Pülzl P, Schoeller T, Kleewein K, Wechselberger G. Donor-site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap in autologous breast reconstruction: short-term and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:233e-42e.

16. Colwell AS. Contemporary lower body lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;151:1001-3.

17. Lockwood TE. Lower-body lift. Aesthet Surg J 2001;21:355-70.

18. Sultan SM, Greenspun DT. Lumbar artery perforator flaps in autologous breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2023;50:301-12.

19. Opsomer D, Vyncke T, Depypere B, Stillaert F, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K. Lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:706e-14e.

20. Vonu PM, Chopan M, Sayadi L, Chim HW, Leyngold M. Lumbar artery perforator flaps: a systematic review of free tissue transfers and anatomical characteristics. Ann Plast Surg 2022;89:465-71.

21. Peters KT, Blondeel PN, Lobo F, van Landuyt K. Early experience with the free lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:1112-9.

22. Hidaka T, Mori H, Shimizu H, Takahashi S, Tanaka K, Okazaki M. Comparison of lumbar artery and superior gluteal artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: multislice CT-based anatomical study. Ann Plast Surg 2022;89:e39-44.

23. Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Lumbar artery perforator flap: initial experience with simultaneous bilateral flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e2800.

24. Kiil BJ, Rozen WM, Pan WR, et al. The lumbar artery perforators: a cadaveric and clinical anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1229-38.

25. Khansa I, Wang D, Coriddi M, Tiwari P. Timing of prophylactic hysterectomy-oophorectomy, mastectomy, and microsurgical breast reconstruction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Microsurgery 2014;34:271-6.

26. Ticha P, Sukop A. Patient-reported outcomes in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction: a narrative review. Breast 2024;73:103602.

27. Stillaert FBJL, Opsomer D, Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K. The lumbar artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;151:41-4.

28. Van Cleven S, Claes K, Vanlander A, Van Landuyt K, Berrevoet F. Incisional lumbar hernia after the use of a lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Acta Chir Belg 2020;120:274-8.

Plastic and Aesthetic Research
ISSN 2349-6150 (Online)   2347-9264 (Print)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/