REFERENCES
1. Jonczyk MM, Jean J, Graham R, Chatterjee A. Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;173:267-74.
2. Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:7S-13S.
3. Davies CF, Macefield R, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Potter S. Patient-reported outcome measures for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review of development and measurement properties. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:386-404.
4. Homsy A, Rüegg E, Montandon D, Vlastos G, Modarressi A, Pittet B. Breast reconstruction: a century of controversies and progress. Ann Plast Surg 2018;80:457-63.
5. Hanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with breast cancer after breast conservation vs mastectomy and reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2022;157:e220631.
6. Rosenberg SM, Dominici LS, Gelber S, et al. Association of breast cancer surgery with quality of life and psychosocial well-being in young breast cancer survivors. JAMA Surg 2020;155:1035-42.
7. Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2018;153:891-9.
8. Nelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8-year examination of 3268 patients. Ann Surg 2019;270:473-83.
9. Sadok N, Refaee MS, Eltahir Y, de Bock GH, van Veen MM, Werker PMN. Quality of life 9 to 13 years after autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: which breast remains best? Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;151:467-76.
10. Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA. Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;73:278-85.
11. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:345-53.
12. Tsangaris E, Klassen AF, Kaur MN, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:7842-53.
13. Segil JL, Roldan LM, Graczyk EL. Measuring embodiment: a review of methods for prosthetic devices. Front Neurorobot 2022;16:902162.
14. Zbinden J, Lendaro E, Ortiz-Catalan M. Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022;19:37.
15. Bekrater-Bodmann R. Perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the prosthesis embodiment scale. Sci Rep 2020;10:14203.
16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
17. Hopwood P, Hopwood N. New challenges in psycho-oncology: an embodied approach to body image. Psychooncology 2019;28:211-8.
18. Hansen ST, Willemoes Rasmussen LA. 'At least there is something in my bra': a qualitative study of women's experiences with oncoplastic breast surgery. J Adv Nurs 2022;78:3304-19.
19. Chuang LY, Hsu YY, Yin SY, Shu BC. Staring at my body: the experience of body reconstruction in breast cancer long-term survivors. Cancer Nurs 2018;41:E56-61.
20. Cheng T, Causarano N, Platt J, et al. Restoring wholeness: women’s embodied experiences in considering post-mastectomy delayed breast reconstruction. Cogent Social Sciences 2018;4:1479478.
21. Holmberg C. No one sees the fear: becoming diseased before becoming ill--being diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 2014;37:175-83.
22. Eftekari SC, Sears L, Moura SP, et al. A framework for understanding prosthetic embodiment for the plastic surgeon. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023;84:469-86.
23. Baicchi A, Digonnet R, Sandford JL. Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology. Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics. Springer Cham; 2018.
24. Braun N, Debener S, Spychala N, et al. The Senses of agency and ownership: a review. Front Psychol 2018;9:535.
25. Slatman J. Multiple dimensions of embodiment in medical practices. Med Health Care Philos 2014;17:549-57.
26. Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, Tsakiris M, Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008;107:978-98.
27. Bekrater-Bodmann R. Factors associated with prosthesis embodiment and its importance for prosthetic satisfaction in lower limb amputees. Front Neurorobot 2020;14:604376.
28. Longo MR. Types of body representation. Available from: https://www.bbk.ac.uk/psychology/bodylab/docs/longo-2016-foundembodcogn.pdf [Last accessed on 30 Aug 2023].
29. Gallagher S, Cole J. Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. J Mind Behav 1995;16:369-89. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43853796 [Last accessed on 30 Aug 2023].
30. Gouzien A, de Vignemont F, Touillet A, et al. Reachability and the sense of embodiment in amputees using prostheses. Sci Rep 2017;7:4999.
31. Di Pino G, Romano D, Spaccasassi C, et al. Sensory- and action-oriented embodiment of neurally-interfaced robotic hand prostheses. Front Neurosci 2020;14:389.
32. Fritsch A, Lenggenhager B, Bekrater-Bodmann R. Prosthesis embodiment and attenuation of prosthetic touch in upper limb amputees-a proof-of-concept study. Conscious Cogn 2021;88:103073.
33. Rognini G, Petrini FM, Raspopovic S, et al. Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019;90:833-6.
34. Brooks SG, Atkinson SL, Cimino SR, Mackay C, Mayo AL, Hitzig SL. Sexuality and sexual health in adults with limb loss: a systematic review. Sex Disabil 2021;39:3-31.
35. Weissler JM, Koltz PF, Carney MJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:550-65.
36. Shiah E, Laikhter E, Comer CD, et al. Neurotization in innervated breast reconstruction: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75:2890-913.
37. Chou J, Hyland CJ, Kaufman Goldberg T, Broyles JM. Is nerve coaptation associated with improved sensation after microvascular breast reconstruction? A systematic review. Microsurgery 2023;43:522-8.
38. Lindau ST, Bensmaia SJ. Using bionics to restore sensation to reconstructed breasts. Front Neurorobot 2020;14:24.
39. Slatman J, Halsema A, Meershoek A. Responding to scars after breast surgery. Qual Health Res 2016;26:1614-26.
40. Boer M, van der Hulst R, Slatman J. The surprise of a breast reconstruction: a longitudinal phenomenological study to women’s expectations about reconstructive surgery. Hum Stud 2015;38:409-30.
41. Piot-Ziegler C, Sassi ML, Raffoul W, Delaloye JF. Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: a qualitative study. Br J Health Psychol 2010;15:479-510.
42. Loaring JM, Larkin M, Shaw R, Flowers P. Renegotiating sexual intimacy in the context of altered embodiment: the experiences of women with breast cancer and their male partners following mastectomy and reconstruction. Health Psychol 2015;34:426-36.
43. Montezuma T, Guirro ECDO, Vaz MMDOLL, Vernal S. Changes in postural control in mastectomized women. JCT 2014;05:493-9.
44. Ahn SY, Bok SK, Song Y, Lee HW, Jung JY, Kim JJ. Dynamic body posture after unilateral mastectomy: a pilot study. Gland Surg 2020;9:1235-43.
45. Mangone M, Bernetti A, Agostini F, et al. Changes in spine alignment and postural balance after breast cancer surgery: a rehabilitative point of view. Biores Open Access 2019;8:121-8.
46. Koralewska A, Domagalska-Szopa M, Łukowski R, Szopa A. Influence of the external breast prosthesis on the postural control of women who underwent mastectomy: cross-sectional study. Front Oncol 2022;12:920211.
47. Ciesla S, Polom K. The effect of immediate breast reconstruction with Becker-25 prosthesis on the preservation of proper body posture in patients after mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36:625-31.
48. Jeong JH, Choi B, Chang SY, et al. The effect of immediate breast reconstruction on thoracic spine alignment after unilateral mastectomy. Clin Breast Cancer 2018;18:214-9.
49. Atanes Mendes Peres AC, Dias de Oliveira Latorre MD, Yugo Maesaka J, Filassi JR, Chada Baracat E, Alves Gonçalves Ferreira E. Body posture after mastectomy: comparison between immediate breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone. Physiother Res Int 2017;22:e1642.
50. Oh JS, Kim H, Jin US. The effect of delayed breast reconstruction after unilateral mastectomy on spine alignment. Gland Surg 2021;10:2368-77.
51. Quixadá AP, Miranda JGV, Osypiuk K, et al. Qigong training positively impacts both posture and mood in breast cancer survivors with persistent post-surgical pain: support for an embodied cognition paradigm. Front Psychol 2022;13:800727.
52. Esplen MJ, Trachtenberg L. Online interventions to address body image distress in cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2020;14:74-9.
53. Adams E, McCann L, Armes J, et al. The experiences, needs and concerns of younger women with breast cancer: a meta-ethnography. Psychooncology 2011;20:851-61.
54. Thomas-MacLean R. Beyond dichotomies of health and illness: life after breast cancer. Nurs Inq 2005;12:200-9.
55. Jong V. Unveiling beauty: insight into being tattooed postmastectomy. Nurs Forum 2022;57:536-44.
56. Parton CM, Ussher JM, Perz J. Women’s construction of embodiment and the abject sexual body after cancer. Qual Health Res 2016;26:490-503.
57. Trachtenberg L, Esplen MJ, Toner B, Piran N. Gender socialization as a predictor of psychosocial well-being in young women with breast cancer. Curr Oncol 2022;29:8121-32.
58. Lende DH, Lachiondo A. Embodiment and breast cancer among African American women. Qual Health Res 2009;19:216-28.
59. Greco C. The poly implant prothèse breast prostheses scandal: embodied risk and social suffering. Soc Sci Med 2015;147:150-7.
60. Graham R, Owens M, Priest H, Hutton S. Constructions of decision making for risk-reducing mastectomy. Qual Health Res 2018;28:1595-609.
61. Liu LQ, Branford OA, Mehigan S. BREAST-Q measurement of the patient perspective in oncoplastic breast surgery: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1904.
62. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:293-302.
63. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Snell L, et al. Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012;12:149-58.
64. Klassen AF, Dominici L, Fuzesi S, et al. Development and validation of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:2238-47.
65. Tsangaris E, Pusic AL, Kaur MN, et al. development and psychometric validation of the breast-q animation deformity scale for women undergoing an implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:5183-93.
66. Kaur MN, Chan S, Bordeleau L, et al. Re-examining content validity of the BREAST-Q more than a decade later to determine relevance and comprehensiveness. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023;7:37.
67. Abbas F, Klomparens K, Simman R. Functional and psychosocial outcomes following innervated breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4559.
68. Shauver MJ, Chung KC. A guide to qualitative research in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1089-97.
69. Snell L, McCarthy C, Klassen A, et al. Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1825-30.
70. Fu R, Chang MM, Chen M, Rohde CH. A qualitative study of breast reconstruction decision-making among asian immigrant women living in the united states. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:360e-8e.
