Robotically-harvested, thoracoscopically-tunneled transdiaphragmatic omental pedicle flap for obliteration of radiated empyema cavity
Abstract
Intra-thoracic defects continue to pose a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. Stable soft tissue coverage and obliteration of dead space can be particularly challenging when complicated by infection or previous radiation. These cases may require a less conventional method of reconstruction. We describe a case in which vacuum-assisted closure followed by pedicled omental flap transposition was successfully used to reconstruct a complicated intra-thoracic wound following pneumonectomy, radiation therapy, and recurrent wound dehiscences secondary to chronic infection.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Intra-thoracic defects are usually left to heal after pneumonectomy without attempting obliteration of the dead space. The space is left full of air, after which a pleural effusion gradually accumulates and the volume decreases due to shifts in the mediastinum and hemidiaphragm. A fixed, serous-filled cavity is the ultimate result under ideal conditions.
In complicated pneumonectomy wounds, the chest wall rigidity and large potential space pose a serious problem[1]. Traditional methods including Clagett[2] and Eloesser[3] procedures combine partial dead space obliteration with exteriorization of the pleural space. Adjuvant radiation therapy complicates healing after these procedures by reducing the tissue’s capability to repair the open wound. Reconstructive plans for these wounds must include (A) encouraging the collapse of the pneumonectomy space; and (B) provision of tissue to both obliterate dead space and create an environment that facilitates healing and closure. Traditional methods involve the intra-thoracic transplantation of various extra-thoracic muscle flaps to control dead space[1,4-6].
When prior surgery, radiation therapy, malnutrition, and infection preempt the use of traditional reconstructive options, the wound environment should be manipulated using ideal tissue options in the least invasive manner possible. We present a case of chronically infected and previously radiated
CASE REPORT
A 74-year-old male presented with an open wound of the left posterior thorax. His past medical history was significant for stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer treated 22 years previously with left pneumonectomy, resection of ribs 2-4, methyl methacrylate thoracoplasty, and adjuvant chemoradiation. His postoperative course was marked by recurrent chest wall hematomas, deep space thoracic infections, and surgical site dehiscence. As a result, the patient was routinely subject to suppressive antibiotic therapy and serial debridement. A latissimus flap had been rotated under the scapula four months previously to cover the superficial wound, but a large empyema cavity remained under it. His albumin was 2.8 g/dL with a body mass index of 21.6 kg/m2.
On exam, there was a 1.5 × 8 cm open, radiated wound medial to the left scapula, which tracked directly to the acrylic reconstruction plate [Figure 1A]. Computed tomography demonstrated a 10.7 × 2.4 × 17 cm void in the left hemithorax with a loculated empyema [Figure 1B-D]. Due to the chronic infection and multiple prior operations, there was a paucity of local recipient vessels for free tissue transfer, and the available vessels were situated in the radiation field.
Figure 1. (A) Pre-operative left posterior thorax wound; (B-D) Coronal, axial, and sagittal sections of pre-operative CT chest demonstrating intra-thoracic defect.
To achieve permanent resolution of the wound, a staged approach was initiated to fundamentally modify the wound biology and configuration. The methyl methacrylate plate was removed, and the empyema cavity was radically debrided. Negative pressure wound therapy and serial debridement were used over a three-week time frame to sterilize the cavity and collapse the left hemithoracic volume. Aggressive nutritional supplementation raised his albumin to 3.2 g/dL.
Once the defect volume was adequately reduced and the infection controlled [Figure 2A-C],
Figure 2. (A-C) Coronal, axial, and sagittal sections of CT chest imaging demonstrating decreased volume of intra-thoracic defect following radical debridement and vacuum-assisted closure.
The patient was placed in the supine position during omental mobilization to provide the uncompromised exposure necessary for precise and complete mobilization of the entire omentum without any vascular compromise. Supine positioning combined with bed tilt movement allowed excellent visualization of all structures involved. The robotic platform further allowed the integrated use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to confirm perfusion, without loss of efficiency in comparison with conventional laparoscopy. The ports were placed in standard foregut position, with fenestrated bipolar, 30-degree camera, vessel sealer, and tip-up in arms 1 through 4, respectively. The right gastroepiploic pedicle was selected for its ability to perfuse a greater portion of the omental tissue [Figure 3A]. Once the omental harvest was completed, the patient was repositioned in the lazy right lateral decubitus position for diaphragmatic opening creation and flap inset. Adequate flap perfusion was confirmed using ICG imaging [Figure 3B]. Simultaneous thoracoscopy allowed visualization of mediastinal contours and creation of a 2 × 4 cm lateral diaphragmatic defect to the left of the heart without damage to critical structures [Figure 3C]. The omental flap was tunneled trans-diaphragmatically into the chest [Figure 3D]. The flap was then inset anteriorly, posteriorly, and apically so that it fully lined the thoracic cavity. The diaphragmatic defect was carefully
Figure 3. (A) Greater omental flap being harvested on the right gastroepiploic vascular pedicle (arrow); (B) Indocyanine green confirmation of adequate flap perfusion; (C) Creation of diaphragmatic defect under direct thoracoscopic and robotically assisted laparoscopic visualization, viewed from abdominal cavity; (D) Abdominal view of omental flap delivered via the diaphragmatic defect; (E) Closure of excess diaphragmatic defect.
Following an uneventful hospital course, the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 6. Long-term antibiotics were discontinued 5 months postoperatively. Over one-year post intervention, the patient’s incisions remained well-healed and free of infection [Figure 4A], and imaging confirmed obliteration of the space with viable omental tissue [Figure 4B-D].
DISCUSSION
Reconstruction of radiated defects poses ongoing challenges, especially when combined with fixed dead space and infection. Autologous, vascularized, non-radiated tissue coverage is advantageous to augment local perfusion and speed healing[7-9]. Free tissue transfer, although a versatile option, has higher rates of complications and failure in radiated recipient sites[10,11].
The omental flap has been well-described in the reconstruction of cardiothoracic defects[12-14]. Its physical advantages include plasticity, a long pedicle, and the ability to be harvested using minimally invasive techniques without a resulting functional deficit[15-18]. More importantly, its rich vascular supply, abundance of immune tissue, and robust healing capacity allow it to modify hostile wound environments[16-19]. While augmenting the local blood supply, the omentum rapidly adheres to inflamed tissue and recruits immune cells. While the flap could not initially obliterate the dead space completely, it was able to alter the wound biology and eventually completely heal the wound.
One prior report on robotic harvest of the pedicled omental flap described exteriorization of the flap via a sub-xiphoid fasciotomy for coverage of an anterior chest wall defect[20]. However, the combination of transdiaphragmatic tunneling[5] to the robotic harvest for coverage of an intra-thoracic defect has not been previously described. The addition of simultaneous thoracoscopy avoided injury to mediastinal structures while tunneling without the need to enlarge the thoracic wound. Without rendezvous guided by the transthoracic laparoscope light as seen from the abdomen, an ideal location for omental transfer would have required trial and error.
The robotic platform allowed for three-dimensional visualization and included augmented visualization with near infra-red spectroscopy using ICG, all of which facilitated rapid assessments of graft function with each step of the procedure. Laparoscopic techniques for omental flap harvest have been well-described but may be limited by imprecise instrumentation and reduced visualization[21,22]. Robotic harvest has emerged as an alternative to laparoscopy, allowing for more precise visualization of the omentum and ensuring fine dissection and minimal risk to adjacent tissues[21,23]. Robotic assistance has been linked to shorter hospital stays and postoperative complications, compared with laparoscopic techniques[21], and can be performed in some cases through a single-port approach[22]. However, robotic procedures are associated with significantly greater costs, limiting their accessibility and adoption[24].
The omental flap possesses unique biological properties that make it exceptionally effective in the reconstruction of hostile intrathoracic wounds. Newer, minimally-invasive methods can be employed to reduce morbidity in frail patients via safe transdiaphragmatic tunneling.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ Contributions:Made substantial contributions to drafting and revisions, as well as performed data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation: Mitchell B, Samaha Y
Made substantial contributions to the manuscript revisions and the procedure described herein: Imai T, Burch M, Brazio P
Availability of data and materialsNot applicable.
Financial support and sponsorshipNone.
Conflicts of interestAll authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participateNot applicable. All participants provided written consent for their information to be used in this study.
Consent for publicationWritten informed consent for publication was obtained.
Copyright© The Author(s) 2023.
REFERENCES
1. Geissen NM, Medairos R, Davila E, et al. Number of ribs resected is associated with respiratory complications following lobectomy with en bloc chest wall resection. Lung 2016;194:619-24.
2. Clagett OT, Geraci JE. A procedure for the management of postpneumonectomy empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1963;45:141-5.
5. Puvvala S, Subramanyam GM, Suraparaju SS, Ravi KB, Munivenkatappa VK, Narreddy SR. Primary chest wall neoplasms-resection and reconstruction. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;32:184-8.
6. Sanna S, Brandolini J, Pardolesi A, et al. Materials and techniques in chest wall reconstruction: a review. J Vis Surg 2017;3:95.
8. Arnold PG, Lovich SF, Pairolero PC. Muscle flaps in irradiated wounds: an account of 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:324-7; discussion 328-9.
10. Tasch C, Pattiss A, Maier S, Lanthaler M, Pierer G. Free flap outcome in irradiated recipient sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4216.
11. Miller H, Bush K, Delancy M, et al. Effect of preoperative radiation on free flap outcomes for head and neck reconstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75:743-52.
12. Shrager JB, Wain JC, Wright CD, et al. Omentum is highly effective in the management of complex cardiothoracic surgical problems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:526-32.
13. Rupprecht H, Ghidau M, Gaab K. Closing a tracheal defect with an omental pedicled gastric flap; a technical note. Bull Emerg Trauma 2017;5:129-31.
14. D'Andrilli A, Ibrahim M, Andreetti C, Ciccone AM, Venuta F, Rendina EA. Transdiaphragmatic harvesting of the omentum through thoracotomy for bronchial stump reinforcement. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:212-5.
15. Malathi L, Das S, Nair JTK, Rajappan A. Chest wall reconstruction: success of a team approach-a 12-year experience from a tertiary care institution. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;36:44-51.
16. Shah NR, Ayyala HS, Tran BNN, Therattil PJ, Keith JD. Outcomes in chest wall reconstruction using methyl methacrylate prostheses: a review of the literature and case series utilizing a novel approach with biologic mesh. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019;35:575-86.
17. Liebermann-Meffert D. The greater omentum. anatomy, embryology, and surgical applications. Surg Clin North Am 2000;80:275-93, xii.
19. Hanwright PJ, Purnell CA, Dumanian GA. Flap reconstruction for esophageal perforation complicating anterior cervical spinal fusion: an 18-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e400.
20. Day SJ, Dy B, Nguyen MD. Robotic omental flap harvest for near-total anterior chest wall coverage: a potential application of robotic techniques in plastic and reconstructive surgery. BMJ Case Rep 2021;14:e237887.
21. Frey JD, Yu JW, Cohen SM, Zhao LC, Choi M, Levine JP. Robotically assisted omentum flap harvest: a novel, minimally invasive approach for vascularized lymph node transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e2505.
22. Teven CM, Yi J, Hammond JB, et al. Expanding the horizon: single-port robotic vascularized omentum lymphatic transplant. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3414.
23. Özkan Ö, Özkan Ö, Çinpolat A, Arıcı C, Bektaş G, Can Ubur M. Robotic harvesting of the omental flap: a case report and mini-review of the use of robots in reconstructive surgery. J Robot Surg 2019;13:539-43.
Cite This Article
How to Cite
Mitchell, B.; Samaha, Y.; Imai, T.; Burch, M.; Brazio, P. Robotically-harvested, thoracoscopically-tunneled transdiaphragmatic omental pedicle flap for obliteration of radiated empyema cavity. Plast. Aesthet. Res. 2023, 10, 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.143
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
About This Article
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data

Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at [email protected].