REFERENCES
1. Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1100-9.
2. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:466-75; discussion 476-7.
3. Chevray PM. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1077-83; discussion 1084-5.
4. Ulusal BG, Cheng MH, Wei FC, Ho-Asjoe M, Song D. Breast reconstruction using the entire transverse abdominal adipocutaneous flap based on unilateral superficial or deep inferior epigastric vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1395-403; discussion 1404-6.
5. Baltodano PA, Schalet G, Rezak K, et al. Early discontinuation of breast free flap monitoring: a strategy driven by national data. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146:258e-64e.
6. McLaughlin M, Porter BE, Cohen-Shohet R, Leyngold MM. Safety of coupled arterial anastomosis in autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021;37:132-5.
7. Selber JC, Angel Soto-Miranda M, Liu J, Robb G. The survival curve: factors impacting the outcome of free flap take-backs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:105-13.
8. Mirzabeigi MN, Wang T, Kovach SJ, Taylor JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Free flap take-back following postoperative microvascular compromise: predicting salvage versus failure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:579-89.
9. Han M, Ochoa E, Zhu B, et al. Risk factors for and cost implications of free flap take-backs: a single institution review. Laryngoscope 2021;131:E1821-9.
10. Odorico SK, Reuter Muñoz K, J Nicksic P, et al. Surgical and demographic predictors of free flap salvage after takeback: a systematic review. Microsurgery 2023;43:78-88.
11. Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Hidalgo DA. Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:97-101.
12. Kwasnicki RM, Noakes AJ, Banhidy N, Hettiaratchy S. Quantifying the limitations of clinical and technology-based flap monitoring strategies using a systematic thematic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3663.
13. Keller A. A new diagnostic algorithm for early prediction of vascular compromise in 208 microsurgical flaps using tissue oxygen saturation measurements. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62:538-43.
14. Nassar AH, Maselli AM, Manstein S, et al. Comparison of various modalities utilized for preoperative planning in microsurgical reconstructive surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022;38:170-80.
15. Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. How to write a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:2761-8.
16. Babineau J. Product review: covidence (systematic review software). J Can Health Libr Assoc 2014;35:68-71.
17. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 2014;72:39.
18. Freeman MD, Margulies IG, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Burish N, Taub PJ. Nonaesthetic applications for botulinum toxin in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146:157-70.
19. Thiessen FEF, Vermeersch N, Tondu T, et al. Dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT) in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a clinical study with a standardized measurement setup. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;252:166-73.
20. Saxena A, Ng E, Raman V, et al. Infrared (IR) thermography-based quantitative parameters to predict the risk of post-operative cancerous breast resection flap necrosis. Infrared Phys Techn 2019;103:103063.
21. Phillips CJ, Barron MR, Kuckelman J, et al. Mobile smartphone thermal imaging characterization and identification of microvascular flow insufficiencies in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flaps. J Surg Res 2021;261:394-9.
22. Lindelauf AAMA, Vranken NPA, Schols RM, Bouman EAC, Weerwind PW, van der Hulst RRWJ. Exploring personalized postoperative non-invasive tissue oximetry in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 2022;45:267-75.
23. Johnson BM, Cullom ME, Egan KG, et al. Comparing tissue oximetry to doppler monitoring in 1367 consecutive breast free flaps. Microsurgery 2023;43:57-62.
24. Pelletier A, Tseng C, Agarwal S, Park J, Song D. Cost analysis of near-infrared spectroscopy tissue oximetry for monitoring autologous free tissue breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011;27:487-94.
25. Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Ho OA, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Evaluating the use of tissue oximetry to decrease intensive unit monitoring for free flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2017;79:42-6.
26. Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Ledinh W, et al. Variables affecting postoperative tissue perfusion monitoring in free flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2015;35:123-8.
27. Saad N, Wang H, Karamanos E. Tissue oximetry readings accurately predict late complications in patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction: exploring the optimal cut point value. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020;36:534-40.
28. Salgarello M, Pagliara D, Rossi M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Postoperative monitoring of free DIEP flap in breast reconstruction with near-infrared spectroscopy: variables affecting the regional oxygen saturation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34:383-8.
29. Carruthers KH, Tiwari P, Yoshida S, Kocak E. Inpatient flap monitoring after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: how long is long enough? J Reconstr Microsurg 2019;35:682-7.
30. Tran PC, DeBrock W, Lester ME, Hartman BC, Socas J, Hassanein AH. The false positive rate of transcutaneous tissue oximetry alarms in microvascular breast reconstruction rises after 24 hours. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021;37:453-557.
31. Kumbasar DE, Hagiga A, Dawood O, Berner JE, Blackburn A. Monitoring breast reconstruction flaps using near-infrared spectroscopy tissue oximetry. Plast Surg Nurs 2021;41:108-11.
32. Koolen PGL, Vargas CR, Ho OA, et al. Does increased experience with tissue oximetry monitoring in microsurgical breast reconstruction lead to decreased flap loss? The learning effect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1093-101.
33. Shammas RL, Cason RW, Sergesketter AR, et al. A comparison of surgical complications in patients undergoing delayed versus staged tissue-expander and free-flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:501-9.
34. Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MH. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:86-95.
35. Olsen MA, Nickel KB, Fox IK, Margenthaler JA, Wallace AE, Fraser VJ. Comparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures. JAMA Surg 2017;152:e172338.
36. Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG. Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2018;153:901-8.
37. Moderhak M, Kołacz S, Jankau J, Juchniewicz T. Active dynamic thermography method for TRAM flap blood perfusion mapping in breast reconstruction. Quant Infr Therm J 2017;14:234-49.
38. Hardwicke JT, Osmani O, Skillman JM. Detection of perforators using smartphone thermal imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:39-41.
39. Halani SH, Hembd AS, Li X, et al. Flap monitoring using transcutaneous oxygen or carbon dioxide measurements. J Hand Microsurg 2022;14:10-8.
40. Schoenbrunner A, Hackenberger PN, DeSanto M, Chetta M. Cost-effectiveness of vioptix versus clinical examination for flap monitoring of autologous free tissue breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:185e-9e.
