REFERENCES
1. Rammos CK, Mohan AT, Maricevich MA, Maricevich RL, Adair MJ, Jacobson SR. Is the SMAS flap facelift safe? A comparison of complications between the Sub-SMAS approach versus the subcutaneous approach with or without SMAS plication in aesthetic rhytidectomy at an academic institution. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39:870-6.
2. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S, et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2074-86.
3. Jacono AA, Malone MH, Lavin TJ. Nonsurgical facial rejuvenation procedures in patients under 50 prior to undergoing facelift: habits, costs, and results. Aesthet Surg J 2017;37:448-53.
4. Rollett R, Bramhall RJ, Khan MA, Riaz M. Facelift for an ehlers-danlos syndrome patient: a case report. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36:NP131-4.
5. Mast BA. Advantages and limitations of the MACS lift for facial rejuvenation. Ann Plast Surg 2014;72:S139-43.
6. Jacono AA, Parikh SS. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31:874-90.
7. Tonnard PL, Verpaele A, Gaia S. Optimising results from minimal access cranial suspension lifting (MACS-lift). Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29:213-20.
8. Mendelson BC, Wong CH. Surgical anatomy of the middle premasseter space and its application in sub-SMAS face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:57-64.
9. Jost G, Levet Y. Parotid fascia and face lifting: a critical evaluation of the SMAS concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;74:42-51.
10. Wassef M. Superficial fascial and muscular layers in the face and neck: a histological study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1987;11:171-6.
11. Levet Y. Comparative anatomy of cutaneous muscles of the face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1987;11:177-9.
12. Broughton M, Fyfe GM. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system of the face: a model explored. Anat Res Int 2013;2013:794682.
13. Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:441-9.
15. Jacono AA, Parikh SS, Kennedy WA. Anatomical comparison of platysmal tightening using superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication vs deep-plane rhytidectomy techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:395-7.
16. Lassus C. Cervicofacial rhytidectomy: the superficial plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997;21:25-31.
17. Ivy EJ, Lorenc ZP, Aston SJ. Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:1135-43.
18. Rossell-Perry P, Paredes-Leandro P. Anatomic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and applications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:504-12.
19. Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1475-90.
20. Alghoul M, Codner MA. Retaining ligaments of the face: review of anatomy and clinical applications. Aesthet Surg J 2013;33:769-82.
21. Huettner F, Vasconez LO, de la Torre JI. Neck rejuvenation--anatomy and clinical correlation. Facial Plast Surg 2012;28:40-51.
22. O’Brien JX, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Ashton MW. Lore’s fascia and the platysma-auricular ligament are distinct structures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:e241-5.
23. Baker DC. Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face lift) with lateral SMASectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2001;21:68-79.
24. Waterhouse N, Vesely M, Bulstrode NW. Modified lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:1021-6.
25. Fogli A, Desouches C. Less invasive face-lifting: platysma anchoring techniques. Clin Plast Surg 2008;35:519-29. vi
26. Jones BM, Lo SJ. How long does a face lift last? Objective and subjective measurements over a 5-year period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:1317-27.
27. Saylan Z. The S-lift: less is more. Aesthet Surg J 1999;19:406-9.
