Download PDF
Letter to Editor  |  Open Access  |  27 Jul 2016

Two-millimeter dermoscopically detected excision margins in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an assessment of radicality and recurrence

Views: 5042 |  Downloads: 1065 |  Cited:  2
Plast Aesthet Res 2016;3:269-70.
10.20517/2347-9264.2016.49 |  © 2016 Plastic and Aesthetic Research
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article

Sir,

Eighty-five percent of all basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) are located in the head and neck, with a markedly increased incidence after the age of 40 years. Complete extirpation in the early phase allows to limit skin excision and facilitates reconstruction, reducing consequent scarring. In the medical literature, it is reported that appropriate excision margins should be included between 3 and 10 mm, based on location, dimensions, margins and histology.[1] BCC margins are defined by the discontinuation of well-known dermoscopic features along the skin lesion borders, so separating cancer from healthy skin.[2] The authors conducted a study to assess the effectiveness of preoperative dermoscopic evaluation of BCC peripheral margins, in order to achieve complete excision.

Fifty-seven patients presenting BCC in the head and neck areas were operated on, from February 2012 to June 2012, at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy. Morphea-type, recurrent and superficial multifocal BCC were not included in the study. In all cases, margins were identified with a polarized-light dermoscope, at 30-fold magnification (Videocap®, Video Loupe VL-7EXII). A 0.5-mm tip skin marker was used to draw incision lines, 2 mm off the dermoscopically detected borders [Figure 1]. The contact plate was applied to the skin with little pressure, to avoid blanching of vessels. The study protocol and procedures met the ethical standards of the committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.

Two-millimeter dermoscopically detected excision margins in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an assessment of radicality and recurrence

Figure 1. Two-millimeter excision margins in a case of a nodular basal cell carcinoma on the nasal dorsum

Excised skin lesions varied from 4 to 15 mm in maximum diameter. The histology report showed: nodular 25 cases (43.9%), infiltrating 2 cases (3.5%), superficial 30 cases (52.6%). In all patients, tumours resulted as being totally excised after histological evaluation. Moreover, at follow-up visits, between 12 and 36 months postoperatively, no recurrence was detected. In terms of lesion dimensions, clinical and dermoscopic assessment corresponded. In 12 cases (21%), borders were apparently well-defined, but dermoscopy showed larger extension, with histologically confirmed excision margins.

Reduced excision margins allowed preservation of healthy tissue, which consented ellipse excision and direct wound closure in most cases. This reflects in better aesthetic results, particularly noteworthy in the facial area.[3]

Less invasive reconstructive procedures, fewer secondary surgeries for reoperation imply reduced costs. Preoperative dermoscopy is quick, straightforward and less expensive than Mohs surgery.

It is evident that an adequate dermoscopic assessment can be performed in every surgical setting, with a portable device.[4]

Our study showed that, following a 2-mm margin excision, no recurrence was observed after a 36-month follow-up period, in contradistinction to the data reported in the medical literature (3.96%).[5]

We believe that a thorough dermoscopic detection of tumour borders contributes significantly to the identification of safe BCC excision margins.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Sterry W, European Dermatology Forum Guideline Committee. Guidelines: the management of basal cell carcinoma. Eur J Dermatol 2006;16:467-75.

2. Giacomel J, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopy of superficial basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:1710-3.

3. Caresana G, Giardini R. Dermoscopy-guided surgery in basal cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010;24:1395-9.

4. Carducci M, Bozzetti M, Foscolo AM, Betti R. Margin detection using digital dermatoscopy improves the performance of traditional surgical excision of basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Dermatol Surg 2011;37:280-5.

5. Gulleth Y, Goldberg N, Silverman RP, Gastman BR. What is the best surgical margin for a Basal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1222-31.

Cite This Article

Export citation file: BibTeX | EndNote | RIS

OAE Style

Simone P2nd, Carusi C, Iannuzzi R, Persichetti P. Two-millimeter dermoscopically detected excision margins in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an assessment of radicality and recurrence. Plast Aesthet Res 2016;3:269-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2016.49

AMA Style

Simone P2nd, Carusi C, Iannuzzi R, Persichetti P. Two-millimeter dermoscopically detected excision margins in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an assessment of radicality and recurrence. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2016; 3: 269-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2016.49

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pierfranco Simone, Carlo Carusi, Riccardo Iannuzzi, Paolo Persichetti. 2016. "Two-millimeter dermoscopically detected excision margins in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an assessment of radicality and recurrence" Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 3: 269-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2016.49

ACS Style

Simone, P2nd.; Carusi C.; Iannuzzi R.; Persichetti P. Two-millimeter dermoscopically detected excision margins in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an assessment of radicality and recurrence. Plast. Aesthet. Res. 2016, 3, 269-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2016.49

About This Article

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), which allows others to remix, tweak and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
5042
Downloads
1065
Citations
2
Comments
0
0

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

0
Download PDF
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Plastic and Aesthetic Research
ISSN 2349-6150 (Online)   2347-9264 (Print)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/