REFERENCES

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2013 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available from: www.plasticsurgery.org. [Last Accessed on 24 June 2014].

2. Benelli L. A new periareolar mammoplasty: the "round block" technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 1990;14:93-100.

3. Lejour M. Vertical mammoplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:100-14.

4. Hall-Findlay EJ. A simplified vertical reduction mammoplasty: shortening of the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:748-59.

5. Hammond DC, Khuthaila DK, Kim J. The interlocking Gore-Tex suture for control of areolar diameter and shape. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:804-9.

6. Franco J, Kelly E, Kelly M. Periareolar augmentation mastopexy with interlocking Gore-Tex suture, retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:728-33.

7. Rosen AD. Periareolar closure with barbed sutures. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36:372-5.

8. Ruff G. Technique and uses for absorbable barbed sutures. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:620-8.

9. Paul MD, Budd M. Evaluating the Quill self-retaining system. Available from: http://www.plasticsurgerypractice.com/2009/03/evaluating-the-quill-self-retaining-system/. [Published 24 March 2009; Last Accessed on 08 September 2016].

10. Rosen AD. Use of absorbable running barbed suture and progressive tension technique in abdominoplasty: a novel approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1024-7.

11. Rosen A, Hartman T. Repair of the midline fascial defect in abdominoplasty with long-acting barbed and smooth absorbable sutures. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31:668-73.

12. Swanson E. A retrospective photometric study of 82 published reports of mastopexy and breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:1282-301.

13. Quill™ self-retaining system (SRS) comprised of Monoderm™ (PGA-PCL) synthetic absorbable surgical suture material. Instructions for use. Angiotech, Reading, PA.

14. Quill™ self-retaining system (SRS) comprised of dyed PDO (polydioxanone) synthetic absorbable surgical suture material. Instructions for use. Angiotech, Reading, PA.

15. Van Breukelen GJ. ANOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:920-5.

16. Shiffman MA. Mastopexy complications In: Shiffman MA, Di Giuseppe A, editors. Body Contouring. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 145-7.

17. Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;134:e642-56.

18. Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hirsch EM. Mastopexy revisited: a review of 150 consecutive cases for complication and revision rates. Aesthet Surg J 2007;27:150-4.

19. Stevens WG, Spring M, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Cohen R, Quardt SM, Hirsch EM. A review of 100 consecutive secondary augmentation/mastopexies. Aesthet Surg J 2007;27:485-92.

20. Spear SL. Augmentation/mastopexy: "surgeon, beware". Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:S133-4.

21. Spear SL, Boehmler JH 4th, Clemens MW. Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:S136-47.